A measure that Maryland lawmakers hoped would address liability concerns relating to a court ruling on dog bites by pit bulls has died in the recent special session on gambling.
The House and Senate could not reconcile differences between the two chambers last week.
Lawmakers wanted to change the law to address liability concerns over a breed-specific court ruling by Maryland’s highest court, which determined pit bulls to be “inherently dangerous.”
The ruling means that in an attack involving a pit bull, plaintiffs in civil lawsuits don’t have to prove the animal’s prior violent behavior for the owner to be held liable for damages. The ruling also means landlords can be held liable in dog-bite cases on their property.
The failure to pass the bill means the court’s ruling will stand.
Topics Legislation Maryland
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
‘Structural Shift’ Occurring in California Surplus Lines 
What Analysts Are Saying About the 2026 P/C Insurance Market 
Trump Demands $1 Billion From Harvard as Prolonged Standoff Appears to Deepen 
Nine-Month 2025 Results Show P/C Underwriting Gain Skyrocketed 
