Connecticut Bans Use of Price Optimization in Insurance Rates

By | December 4, 2015

Connecticut has joined the growing number of states that have banned or restricted the practice of “price optimization” in insurance pricing.

Connecticut Insurance Commissioner Katharine L. Wade announced that the state’s Insurance Department has officially warned property/casualty insurers against using a controversial pricing method that relies more on consumer buying habits than sound actuarial and risk-based principles.

Termed “price optimization” or “elasticity of demand,” the practice gives insurance companies the ability to use a wide variety of non-cost based factors to increase premiums to the highest amount before a consumer would seek to shop around with other carriers, the department said.

The department’s Dec. 4 bulletin states that carriers that use this methodology to rate personal lines policies delivered or issued for delivery in Connecticut will need to submit revised filings that remove such factors within 60 days after the date of the bulletin.

“Insurers that fail to do so and are later determined to have used price optimization or elasticity of demand or failed to disclose such use to the commissioner may be subject to disciplinary action,” the bulletin stated.

Wade said the department views price optimization as “a discriminatory practice and therefore a violation of state insurance law.” It can result in two policyholders who have the same loss history and risk profile receiving two different premium increases, she said.

“A consumer’s propensity to shop for insurance or complain about rates are some examples of price optimization data points being used around the country,” Wade added. “These are not acceptable rating factors in determining premiums and will not be permitted in Connecticut.”

The department said its action is consistent with research and recommendations included in a recent National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ white paper on price optimization.

Connecticut is the 16th jurisdiction to prohibit or restrict the practice of price optimization that utilizes non-risk based factors in insurance pricing. Others include: California, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, Montana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.

Related:

The following is a copy of the department’s bulletin:

https://www.scribd.com/doc/292148021/Conn-Bulletin-on-Price-Optimization-Ban

Topics Connecticut

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • January 3, 2016 at 6:43 pm
    Adjuster says:
    You've got it backwards. The prices are lower for the price-sensitive group. They're rewarding them for taking up more of your time. People who stick around get a price increa... read more
  • December 8, 2015 at 9:22 am
    Fair Playing Field says:
    Charging profitable risks more solely because they are less price-discriminatory and have higher retention in order to subsidize a lesser performing segment of a book is flat-... read more
  • December 7, 2015 at 10:06 am
    Ron says:
    So far, mostly blue states have banned this poor, free-market based practice. We need more red states to follow suit.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (6)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features