Be careful with that thing. It could put someone’s eye out.
That’s the upshot from a Sussex County, Delaware, judge’s ruling that State Farm doesn’t have to indemnify a policyholder in a paintball injury lawsuit.
The June 7 ruling involves an incident in which a boy fired a paintball gun at a group of kids, hitting one of them in the eye and causing a severe injury.
The victim’s family sued the shooter’s family, which sought coverage under their homeowner’s policy.
The judge agreed with State Farm that it is not liable because the policy includes a provision excluding coverage for bodily injury or property damage that is either expected or intended by the insured. He said the shooter intentionally fired the paintball at the other kids knowing that someone could get hurt.
Topics Lawsuits Legislation State Farm
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Florida AG Says His Office Investigating ‘Anti-Public Adjuster’ Endorsements in Policies 
KCC Says Isaias Insured Losses to Be $3 Billion; AM Best Calls Storm an Earnings Event 
Reuters: DXC in Advanced Talks to Sell Insurance Software Unit for $2.4 Billion 
Alabama Pharmacy, Not Agent, at Fault for Not Reading Policy Before $5M Judgment 
