Environmentalists Warn of Spill Risk from Increasing Oil Shipments on Hudson River By Scott Fallon | June 21, 2016 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 2 Comments June 21, 2016 at 1:55 pm BrianD says: Like or Dislike: 1 1Duh. They stop the safer alternative Keystone pipeline, and just assume the oil will just stay where it is? Of course it now has to be moved by less safe and less efficient means, truck, rail and ship. All with higher risk and cost. Reply June 21, 2016 at 3:16 pm Agent says: Like or Dislike: 1 1I didn’t see any mention of the danger of Uncle Warren’s railroad transport of oil from the area. One bad derailment would be worse than one tanker. Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
Duh. They stop the safer alternative Keystone pipeline, and just assume the oil will just stay where it is? Of course it now has to be moved by less safe and less efficient means, truck, rail and ship. All with higher risk and cost.
I didn’t see any mention of the danger of Uncle Warren’s railroad transport of oil from the area. One bad derailment would be worse than one tanker.