Sandy Hook Families Ask Connecticut Top Court to Hear Suit

By | November 16, 2016

The families of some of the 26 children and educators killed at a Connecticut elementary school in 2012 asked the state’s top court on Tuesday to overturn a lower court’s dismissal of their lawsuit against the maker of the gun used in the massacre.

A Connecticut Superior Court judge last month dismissed the 2014 lawsuit against Remington Arms, the North Carolina-based maker of the Bushmaster AR-15-style assault weapon used in the attack on Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.

She ruled that the 2005 federal law known as the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act protected Remington from being sued when its products are used in an illegal manner. The families had argued that the gun never should have been sold because, they said, it had no legitimate civilian purpose.

The gun had been bought legally by the mother of 20-year-old gunman Adam Lanza, whom he shot dead in their Newtown home before his rampage. He ended it by turning the weapon on himself when he heard the sirens of approaching police.

The appeal focuses on the common law principle of “negligent entrustment” to make the case that the weapon should not have been sold to Nancy Lanza, said Josh Koskoff, an attorney for the families. The lawsuit seeks unspecified monetary damages.

“Nothing will ever bring back my son,” said Nicole Hockley, whose son, Dylan, was among the 20 6- and 7-year-olds killed in the Dec. 14, 2012, attack. “Our only goal in bringing this appeal is to help prevent the next Sandy Hook from happening.”

Remington officials did not immediately respond to a call seeking comment.

So-called assault rifles like the Bushmaster have been used in several recent mass shootings in the United States. They include the attack on a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida, in June that took 49 lives and was the deadliest shooting in U.S. history.

The AR-15 was developed from the U.S. military’s M-16 rifle, used in the Vietnam War in the 1960s. Unlike the military version, the AR-15 is not fully automatic, meaning users must pull the trigger each time they want to fire a shot.

(Reporting by Scott Malone in Boston; Editing by Dan Grebler)

Topics Lawsuits USA Connecticut

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • December 9, 2016 at 9:03 am
    Captain Planet says:
    More censorship, must be Drumpf’s Divided States: Don’t you all love how President-elect Drumpf called to thank a guy who doesn’t believe Sandy Hook actually happened? Y... read more
  • December 5, 2016 at 9:02 am
    Captain Planet says:
    censors Agent, I do not believe in Communism. I believe in Capitalism. Just not Reagan’s failed version of it. I take calling me a commie as an insult. Please stop insulting... read more
  • December 5, 2016 at 9:02 am
    Captain Planet says:
    censors I didn’t say it, Alex Jones did. And, Drumpf does consider Alex one of his friends. Patti, I was actually agreeing with you when I wrote, “Like you said, it is a s... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (34)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features