Iowa Woman Ordered to Pay Nearly $50k in Dog Bite Case August 12, 2008 Email This Subscribe to Newsletter Email to a friend Facebook Tweet LinkedIn Print Article Article 5 Comments August 12, 2008 at 3:12 am Heinrich says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Who’s the *****? Reply August 13, 2008 at 8:26 am Wes says: Like or Dislike: 0 0Why is this crap in the Claims Journal? Somebody needs to fire an editor… W Reply August 13, 2008 at 11:41 am Ratemaker says: Like or Dislike: 0 0It’s in the IJ because Kissee’s homeowners insurer is probably the one who is going to pay the damages. Of course, it doesn’t say anything that everyone in the industry doesn’t already know. All it really says is “dog bite claims are expensive.” Reply August 13, 2008 at 1:25 am ad says: Like or Dislike: 0 0If she had insurance, they messed up big time, or they were not informed. Since there was no response by the defendant, the guy won. I wonder how bad his bite(s) really were. Reply August 13, 2008 at 3:54 am Mike says: Like or Dislike: 0 0It said loss of bodily function?? Got bit in his privates? Reply Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Name * Email * Comment ΔNotify me of comments via e-mail
Who’s the *****?
Why is this crap in the Claims Journal?
Somebody needs to fire an editor…
W
It’s in the IJ because Kissee’s homeowners insurer is probably the one who is going to pay the damages.
Of course, it doesn’t say anything that everyone in the industry doesn’t already know. All it really says is “dog bite claims are expensive.”
If she had insurance, they messed up big time, or they were not informed. Since there was no response by the defendant, the guy won. I wonder how bad his bite(s) really were.
It said loss of bodily function?? Got bit in his privates?