Nebraska Court: Insurance Won’t Cover Fireworks Injury

October 24, 2011

A judge has ruled a Lincoln, Neb., man can’t get help from his insurance company to pay for injuries inflicted on an 80-year-old woman in a fireworks accident because it happened during a criminal act.

The Lincoln Journal Star reported a Lancaster County judge issued the ruling in the case of David Parr, who injured Ioma Sukstof in the face and broke her jaw when a pipe filled with gunpowder exploded in July 2009.

Sukstorf filed a lawsuit against Parr, seeking $338,000 in damages.

A judge ruled Parr’s insurance company, Farmers Mutual, didn’t have to pay damages because his policy excludes coverage for injury or damage caused by a criminal act.

Parr was convicted of third-degree assault for the incident.

A telephone listing for Parr was disconnected.

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • October 24, 2011 at 5:07 pm
    Mark says:
    From the perspective of the drunk driver's auto liability insurer, you could be right, but it would depend on whether the driver is convicted of committing a crime (e.g., assa... read more
  • October 24, 2011 at 3:12 pm
    Wayne says:
    So does this ruling apply to liability payments to injured victims of a drunk driver if the driver is criminally charged? I bet some lawyer for an insurance carrier will make ... read more
  • October 24, 2011 at 2:03 pm
    sandman says:
    They claimed because it was on his property they should pay even when the one who did it was getting a nice settlement. We insured everyone and the day after one of them go... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (6)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features