My opinion: The court should take judicial notice of the well-known fact that there is almost no nutritional value in Pop Tarts and promptly enter a dismissal.
The court should also take note that regardless of what you are selling you shouldn’t be allowed to lie like hell & get away with it. Lie about strawberries today & sales & profits tomorrow. What’s wrong with expecting a little honesty?
Really? Is anyone who eats Pop Tarts really concerned about the nutritional value? If you are truly focused on nutrition, you are probably not eating Pop Tarts.
My opinion: The court should take judicial notice of the well-known fact that there is almost no nutritional value in Pop Tarts and promptly enter a dismissal.
If I didn’t know better, I would be inclined to say, now I’ve seen it all! Really people!! Nothing better to do?
Being that they are Pop Tarts, I assumed there was nothing real in them and nothing of nutritional value. I agree with Dave, throw the suit out.
The court should also take note that regardless of what you are selling you shouldn’t be allowed to lie like hell & get away with it. Lie about strawberries today & sales & profits tomorrow. What’s wrong with expecting a little honesty?
Is this the same attorney that’s suing Geico because a woman got pregnant in the backseat of a car they insure?
C’mon, people…no real strawberries in Strawberry Pop Tarts? Next you’re going to try to tell me there’s no actual froot in Froot Loops.
The GEICO claim is for STD’s, not pregnancy…. unless there’s a new case I haven’t read about yet.
You’re right, and I stand corrected. My apologies, but my point is still the same. It’s ridiculous.
Really? Is anyone who eats Pop Tarts really concerned about the nutritional value? If you are truly focused on nutrition, you are probably not eating Pop Tarts.