The Senate was unsuccessful in keeping negotiations alive at creating a federally run asbestos trust fund (S. 2290) to compensate victims of asbestos diseases. Talks ended when parties mutually agreed to disagree over how big the fund should be.
S. 2290, the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act, would have replaced the tort process with an exclusive fund which insurers hoped would put a bottom-line dollar figure on asbestos-related losses and help them reserve accordingly.
David A. Winston, a lobbyist for the National Association of Mutual Insurance Cos., said the negotiations were conducted in good faith. Nonetheless, the sides could not come close to an agreement, making a political outcome unlikely this year. The bill’s proponents did not have the 60 votes necessary to achieve cloture in the Senate and forestall a filibuster.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
A-Cap Insurers Agree to Mediation in Rehab Dispute with SCDOI Director 
Takeaways From AP Analysis on the Flaws in National Flood Insurance 
Town Denied Insurance for $11M Judgment Over the Political Closing of Quarry 
NY Governor Urges Review of Cornell Response to Assault Case 
