The Supreme Court handed a victory to Medtronic Inc., ruling that patients cannot sue medical-device manufacturers in state court over harm from a device that has approval from federal regulators.
By an 8-1 vote, the court ruled a 1976 law creating federal safety oversight for medical devices bars state-law claims challenging safety or effectiveness of devices that have won premarket approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
The case involved a New York man who was injured in 1996 when a doctor inflated a balloon catheter during an artery-clearing procedure.
Medtronic has said the doctor in the case used the catheter contrary to labeling instructions and in a patient for whom it was not recommended. The company no longer makes that specific catheter.
A federal trial court in Albany, New York, dismissed the lawsuit, finding the patient was not entitled to state law remedies because of the FDA’s prior approval of the device.
A U.S. appeals court agreed that the lawsuit was pre-empted by federal law, and the Supreme Court upheld that decision.
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the court majority that state law claims are pre-empted when the FDA gives premarket approval. which imposes specific requirements for a particular medical device.
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was the lone dissenter.
“Congress, in my view, did not intend (for the 1976 law) to effect a radical curtailment of state common-law suits seeking compensation for injuries caused by defectively designed or labeled medical devices,” she wrote.
(Additional reporting by Lisa Richwine) (Reporting by James Vicini, Editing by Dave Zimmerman)
(c) Reuters 2008. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.