The Supreme Court says bankruptcy courts have limited authority to rule on disputes outside the traditional bankruptcy process.
The justices ruled unanimously this week that a Washington state bankruptcy court did not exceed its powers when it considered a lawsuit claiming the Bellingham Insurance Agency had wrongfully transferred assets to the another insurance company shortly before declaring bankruptcy.
Lower courts had upheld the bankruptcy court action. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found the bankruptcy judge was simply making recommendations that were later approved by a federal judge and that all parties had consented to the proceeding.
In an opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, the high court agreed that a bankruptcy court can rule on non-bankruptcy matters as long as a federal district court reviews those findings.
The case is Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison, 12-1200.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/229084773/Supreme-Court-Bankruptcy-Ruling
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Climate Change Keeps Adding to List of Uninsurable Assets, Allianz Executive Says 
PE-Backed Insurance Broker Hub International Files Confidentially for US IPO 
Why Are Property & Casualty Carriers So Profitable? 
Florida Supreme Court Ruling Could Mean New Pressure to Settle High-Dollar Lawsuits 
