Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • 2024 P/C Combined Ratio Best in More Than a Decade
  • Judge Backs 17% State Farm Rate Hike in California
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

Judge: Facebook ‘Could Not Be More Wrong’ in Cambridge Analytica Defense

By Joel Rosenblatt | September 11, 2019
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article
  • 4 Comments

Facebook Inc. users suing over the social network’s worst-ever privacy scandal gained leverage to pry into its internal records to back up their claims that it failed to safeguard their personal data, exposing the company to potentially billions of dollars in damages.

A federal judge in San Francisco rejected Facebook’s request to throw out a lawsuit claiming the company deceived users into allowing their data to be harvested. The information was sold to a U.K. political consulting firm that mined it to help Donald Trump win the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

According to Facebook, “if people use social media to communicate sensitive information with a limited number of friends, they have no right to complain of a privacy violation if the social media company turns around and shares that information with a virtually unlimited audience,” U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria wrote in Monday’s ruling. “Facebook’s argument could not be more wrong.”

“When you share sensitive information with a limited audience, especially when you’ve made clear that you intend your audience to be limited, you retain privacy rights and can sue someone for violating them,” Chhabria wrote.

In allowing the suit over Cambridge Analytica to move forward, Chhabria opened the door for the users to get a glimpse of Facebook’s internal operations in their quest for make the company pay damages and rewrite policies for handling personal information.

District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine, who filed a similar suit against Facebook, won permission May 31 to proceed with his case. The company agreed in July to pay $5 billion to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission investigation of privacy violations stemming from the scandal.

Facebook has faced a storm of controversy since the revelation early last year that Trump’s campaign benefited from the work of an app developer who started out by collecting personal information from 300,000 users, and later, from those users’ friends. Unbeknownst to users, the developer shared the data trove with Cambridge Analytica, which used it to target voters in 2016 with hyper-specific appeals through “psychographic” modeling.

While Cambridge Analytica’s research drew on as many as 87 million Facebook users, the ensuing lawsuits were filed on behalf of everyone in the U.S. who uses the social network.

Business Partners

The lawsuit targets Facebook’s relationships with “business partners,” a broad category that includes device manufacturers such as Samsung Electronics Co., website Yahoo!, as well as Amazon.com Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Sony Corp.

Facebook allegedly gave those partners access to its users’ information and that of their friends. Those companies in turn shared data with Facebook. Chhabria ruled users have adequately alleged they didn’t consent to such sharing.

Facebook contends it disclosed its practices in user agreements. It has also argued that anyone sharing their information on a social network shouldn’t count on holding onto their privacy.

“You have to closely guard something in order to have a reasonable expectation of privacy,” the company’s lawyer, Orin Snyder, told Chhabria at a May 29 hearing. “There is no expectation of privacy when you go on a social media platform,” the purpose of which is to share things with big groups of people, he said.

“You can’t cry foul, that there’s gambling going on in this establishment, when you’ve been warned,” Snyder told the judge.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal demonstrated in a “dramatic way” that Facebook doesn’t have control in cases where an app developer breaks a data-sharing agreement with the company, the attorney said.

Lesley Weaver and Derek Loeser, lawyers representing the users, said in an emailed statement that they “look forward to the discovery process that will prove our clients’ claims.”

Facebook didn’t immediately respond to an email request for comment.

The case is In Re Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, 18-MD-02843, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

Copyright 2025 Bloomberg.

Topics Lawsuits USA Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

State Farm VP Apologizes to Homeowner While Allstate Gets Grilled at Senate Hearing
Q1 Shows ‘Clear’ Signs of Commercial P/C Softening, Says CIAB
Central US Severe Weather Outbreak Caused Billions in Damages, AccuWeather Says
Complaints About Florida Insurers Have More Than Doubled in 5 Years, or Have They?

Written By Joel Rosenblatt

More From Author

Interested in Lawsuits?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: Facebook Cambridge Analytica, Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, Facebook privacy, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com

Featured Comment

  • September 11, 2019 at 3:11 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 8

    Fakebook is a lot like HAL in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. It needs to be brought down a couple rungs; i.e. a couple $billion, to learn to behave like an unbiased social media platform. Otherwise, it should be abandoned by all who believe in the US Constitution and amendments thereto.

Latest Comments

  • September 12, 2019 at 11:42 am
    KP says:
    Our Civil Rights are slowly being erased. Open your eyes people.
  • September 11, 2019 at 10:52 pm
    Jon says:
    Lol you guys follow the company line through and through. The right hates the tech companies, because they're new money when the right is traditionally funded by old money. Ne... read more
  • September 11, 2019 at 5:28 pm
    Agent says:
    Correct Polar. These Tech giants should be brought down. Anti-American Progressive Socialists.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

More News
EEOC_SealAustin Bar to Pay $42K Over Pregnancy Discrimination Lawsuit
EU to Propose Removing Business Barriers to Enhance Competitiveness Amid US Tariffs
Former Progressive CEO Renwick, 69, Dies
Hack of Contractor Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
More News Features

Read This Next

  • Judge: Facebook 'Could Not Be More Wrong' in Cambridge Analytica Defense
  • State Farm VP Apologizes to Homeowner While Allstate Gets Grilled at Senate Hearing
  • Capital One to Pay $425 Million to Settle Claims Over Savings Accounts
  • Auto Coverage Under a CGL Policy
  • Anticipated Regulatory Changes With OSHA

Insurance Jobs

  • Outside Property Claim Representative Trainee - El Monte, CA
  • Sales Agent – Charlotte - Charlotte, NC
  • General Liability – Technical Specialist - Centennial, CO
  • Portfolio Manager, Delivery Management - Fort Lee, NJ
  • Professional Services Lead Associate Broker - New York, NY
MyNewMarkets
  • 5 Ways to Prepare for Healthcare Liability Changes in 2025
  • What's Next For Workers' Comp?
  • Soft D&O Market May Come to an End as Risk Complexities Rise
  • Exclusions: Active Assailant Coverage - Oh My!
  • 10 Things to Know About Insuring Boats & Marinas
Claims Journal
  • State Farm Still Wants a 30% Rate Increase in California
  • No NOAA Large-Disaster Data Could Hurt Insurer Grasp of Secondary Perils, Says AM Best
  • Marks & Spencer Says Cyberattack to Cost $403 Million
  • APCIA Says Record Shows 'Minimal Complaints' on Hurricane Milton, Helene Claims
  • Mitchell: Claims Frequency of Battery Electric Vehicles up as Sales Face Tariff Threat
Academy of Insurance education
  • May 22 Commercial Property: Five Bombs and How to Defuse Them
  • June 5 E&O and Hard Markets: How Trying to Keep a Client Might Cause Trouble
  • June 12 Rating AI Tools: Balancing Functionality and Security
  • June 19 Can You Hear Me? Yes, I Am Listening!

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2025 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map