Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • Farmers Data Breach Could Impact 1M+ Customers
  • ‘Big Four’ Reinsurers Maintain Property-Cat Appetite
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

Judge: Facebook ‘Could Not Be More Wrong’ in Cambridge Analytica Defense

By Joel Rosenblatt | September 11, 2019
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article
  • 4 Comments

Facebook Inc. users suing over the social network’s worst-ever privacy scandal gained leverage to pry into its internal records to back up their claims that it failed to safeguard their personal data, exposing the company to potentially billions of dollars in damages.

A federal judge in San Francisco rejected Facebook’s request to throw out a lawsuit claiming the company deceived users into allowing their data to be harvested. The information was sold to a U.K. political consulting firm that mined it to help Donald Trump win the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

According to Facebook, “if people use social media to communicate sensitive information with a limited number of friends, they have no right to complain of a privacy violation if the social media company turns around and shares that information with a virtually unlimited audience,” U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria wrote in Monday’s ruling. “Facebook’s argument could not be more wrong.”

“When you share sensitive information with a limited audience, especially when you’ve made clear that you intend your audience to be limited, you retain privacy rights and can sue someone for violating them,” Chhabria wrote.

In allowing the suit over Cambridge Analytica to move forward, Chhabria opened the door for the users to get a glimpse of Facebook’s internal operations in their quest for make the company pay damages and rewrite policies for handling personal information.

District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine, who filed a similar suit against Facebook, won permission May 31 to proceed with his case. The company agreed in July to pay $5 billion to resolve a U.S. Federal Trade Commission investigation of privacy violations stemming from the scandal.

Facebook has faced a storm of controversy since the revelation early last year that Trump’s campaign benefited from the work of an app developer who started out by collecting personal information from 300,000 users, and later, from those users’ friends. Unbeknownst to users, the developer shared the data trove with Cambridge Analytica, which used it to target voters in 2016 with hyper-specific appeals through “psychographic” modeling.

While Cambridge Analytica’s research drew on as many as 87 million Facebook users, the ensuing lawsuits were filed on behalf of everyone in the U.S. who uses the social network.

Business Partners

The lawsuit targets Facebook’s relationships with “business partners,” a broad category that includes device manufacturers such as Samsung Electronics Co., website Yahoo!, as well as Amazon.com Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Sony Corp.

Facebook allegedly gave those partners access to its users’ information and that of their friends. Those companies in turn shared data with Facebook. Chhabria ruled users have adequately alleged they didn’t consent to such sharing.

Facebook contends it disclosed its practices in user agreements. It has also argued that anyone sharing their information on a social network shouldn’t count on holding onto their privacy.

“You have to closely guard something in order to have a reasonable expectation of privacy,” the company’s lawyer, Orin Snyder, told Chhabria at a May 29 hearing. “There is no expectation of privacy when you go on a social media platform,” the purpose of which is to share things with big groups of people, he said.

“You can’t cry foul, that there’s gambling going on in this establishment, when you’ve been warned,” Snyder told the judge.

The Cambridge Analytica scandal demonstrated in a “dramatic way” that Facebook doesn’t have control in cases where an app developer breaks a data-sharing agreement with the company, the attorney said.

Lesley Weaver and Derek Loeser, lawyers representing the users, said in an emailed statement that they “look forward to the discovery process that will prove our clients’ claims.”

Facebook didn’t immediately respond to an email request for comment.

The case is In Re Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, 18-MD-02843, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).

Copyright 2025 Bloomberg.

Topics Lawsuits USA Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Kraft, Other Companies Beat Test Lawsuit Over Ultra-Processed Foods
Farmers Insurance Data Breach Could Impact More Than a Million Customers
TransUnion: Aggressive Shopping Continues for Home, Auto Coverage
Containment Increases on California Wine Country Wildfire

Written By Joel Rosenblatt

More From Author

Interested in Lawsuits?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: Facebook Cambridge Analytica, Facebook Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation, Facebook privacy, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com

Featured Comment

  • September 11, 2019 at 3:11 pm
    PolarBeaRepeal says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 8

    Fakebook is a lot like HAL in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. It needs to be brought down a couple rungs; i.e. a couple $billion, to learn to behave like an unbiased social media platform. Otherwise, it should be abandoned by all who believe in the US Constitution and amendments thereto.

Latest Comments

  • September 12, 2019 at 11:42 am
    KP says:
    Our Civil Rights are slowly being erased. Open your eyes people.
  • September 11, 2019 at 10:52 pm
    Jon says:
    Lol you guys follow the company line through and through. The right hates the tech companies, because they're new money when the right is traditionally funded by old money. Ne... read more
  • September 11, 2019 at 5:28 pm
    Agent says:
    Correct Polar. These Tech giants should be brought down. Anti-American Progressive Socialists.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

More News
Anthropic Thwarts Hacker Attempts to Misuse Claude AI for Cybercrime
Viewpoint: Why Reinsurance Industry Often Struggles to Manage Market Cycles
Cyber Outlook Report Finds Gaps, Outlines Holistic Approach to Protections
Katrina 2005-2025: Lessons Learned
More News Features

Read This Next

  • Judge: Facebook 'Could Not Be More Wrong' in Cambridge Analytica Defense
  • Most Losses in Destructive Eaton Fire Tied to Conflagration Hazard, Report Shows
  • Another HO Insurer, Viceroy, Approved for Florida Market, Regulators Say
  • Federal Judge Stops FEMA From Diverting Infrastructure, Disaster Mitigation Grants
  • 5-Year Cost of Litigation Funding to Commercial Insurers Could Top $25B

Insurance Jobs

  • Insurance Account Executive/Manager Wanted Flexible Hours, Potential Equity - Dix Hills/Deer Park, NY
  • Sales Agent - Encino, California
  • Underwriting Professional Development Program, MMBC Commercial Accounts – November 2025 - Saint Paul, MN
  • Assistant Client Services Specialist - Cruz Bay, Virgin Islands
  • Associate Counsel, Claim - Morristown, NJ
MyNewMarkets
  • When Insurance Isn't the Optimal Risk Management Approach
  • Reputation Risk Can Overshadow Ransom in Cyberattacks, Aon Says
  • Tackling Cyber Risks: The Vital Role of Brokers in Third-Party Data Protection
  • DIY Home Inspections Are Taking Over, Firms Say
  • Six Things to Know About Umbrella Insurance
Claims Journal
  • FTC Sues LA Fitness for Making it Exceedingly Hard to Cancel Gym Memberships
  • EU Carmakers Warn Combustion Engine Ban Is No Longer Feasible
  • Peloton Must Face Shareholder Lawsuit Over Post-Pandemic Outlook
  • Most Losses in Destructive Eaton Fire Tied to Conflagration Hazard, Report Shows
  • 20 Years Later, Hurricane Katrina's Impact Echoes in Models, Mitigation and Reforms
Academy of Insurance education
  • August 7 EPLI Basics
  • August 14 Managing and Insuring Reputational Risk
  • August 19 How To Write: Flood
  • August 21 Workers' Comp Crash Course

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2025 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map