Boosting Resilience to U.S. Wildfires Should Be Insurance Industry Priority: I.I.I.

November 6, 2019

Nearly a year after the deadliest and costliest wildfire in U.S. history, insurers and the customers they cover are revisiting how to reduce their collective exposure to this risk, according to the Insurance Information Institute (I.I.I.).

“While our research has been in the works for the last year because of California’s catastrophic wildfires in 2017 and 2018, the wildfires we’ve seen in recent weeks makes these findings all too real and timely,” said Sean Kevelighan, CEO, I.I.I. “The increased severity of these wildfires stems in part from too many people residing in harm’s way. Builders and residents need to focus on how to be more resilient, or reconsider altogether whether to place homes in certain areas.”

The Camp Fire, which began on Nov. 8, 2018, killed 85 people and caused $8.47 billion in insured losses in Butte County, said the I.I.I, quoting statistics from the California Department of Insurance (DOI).

The insured loss dollar figure represents the payouts to customers as of May 2019 from the 28,118 auto, residential, and commercial property insurance claims generated from the Camp Fire event.

However, the I.I.I. estimated the Camp Fire’s insured auto, residential, and commercial property insurance claim payouts will total anywhere from $8.5 billion to $10.5 billion, when all Camp Fire-related claims are paid.

“Building codes that incorporate fire-resilient construction, such as fire-resistive roofs, can help protect new housing stock from wildfire damage,” the I.I.I. said in a new white paper, titled “Fighting Wildfires with Innovation,” which cites the insurance industry’s support for groups like Stronger California, which is a coalition of homeowners’ insurance companies.

“For example, an analysis found that 51 percent of houses in Paradise, California built with the state’s updated 2008 building codes survived the 2018 Camp Fire; in contrast, only 18 percent of houses without the updated building codes survived,” said the white paper.

The I.I.I.’s paper said insurers are encouraging customers to harden their homes by installing Class A fire-rated roofs, metal screens which cover all vents, and double or multi-paned tempered glass windows. “Creating what’s called a defensible space around a structure can significantly reduce the risk of embers and surface fires spreading and igniting the structure.”

Moreover, the I.I.I.’s white paper addresses the regulatory challenges insurers face amid the growing frequency and severity of wildfires, especially in California, where that state’s DOI prohibits property insurers from using either the cost of reinsurance or catastrophe models when setting property insurance premium rates.

“Instead, insurers are often required to rely only on their own historical loss data to set prices, regardless of what the anticipated future risk might be,” the I.I.I.’s paper said.

“This could result in underpricing of wildfire risks in some areas, since there might be as yet little historical loss data for catastrophic losses—even in high-risk areas,” it continued. “Some have argued that the cumulative effect of these and other regulations may be creating an unsustainable financial environment for insurers that seek to offer property insurance in high-risk areas, since they cannot accurately price risk.”

The Insurance Information Institute’s wildfire paper is the first in a series which will examine how the insurance industry supports resilience to natural disasters and extreme weather events. The white paper includes charts illustrating how states such as Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, and Texas also face extreme wildfire risks.

Source: Insurance Information Institute

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • November 8, 2019 at 1:43 pm
    MichelJoy DelRe says:
    One of the least costly and most effective ways to prevent forest fires has not been mentioned. Its what cities like Reno, NV and Irvine, CA are using....goat herds. YES! G... read more
  • November 7, 2019 at 2:44 pm
    jestr says:
    As long as environmentalist continue to file suits that basically ties PG&E's hands in clearing brush and trees from around power lines this will continue unabated. Devel... read more
  • November 7, 2019 at 10:34 am
    Terri says:
    Prohibiting homeowners from clearing around their property due to 'environmental concerns' needs to change. And the Governor's attitude toward PGE needs to change. There needs... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (5)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features