No Coverage Owed for Shooting Due to Criminal Act Exclusion

By | July 1, 2020

  • July 1, 2020 at 1:23 pm
    Jack says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 7
    Thumb down 11

    Better get out there and purchase coverage from someone like USCCA if you expect coverage for self-defense.

    • July 1, 2020 at 2:23 pm
      Jon says:
      Hot debate. What do you think?
      Thumb up 17
      Thumb down 12

      How did you read that article and conclude that it was self defense? Oh yeah, because you’re racist. Racist old lady shot a boy in the head and got 15 years rightly and rightly so. This was not self-defense, it was a criminal act, period.

      • July 1, 2020 at 2:52 pm
        Oh Goody says:
        Like or Dislike:
        Thumb up 7
        Thumb down 4

        How did you read his comment and conclude that he thought it was self defense? He said that if someone shoots someone and claims self defense, that they should have the right type of insurance to defend the claim. This is assuming that self defense is considered a criminal act by the personal liability carrier, which it is not. I think a personal liability policy should defend a suit in the case of self defense, but I don’t think this case can be considered self defense.

        • July 1, 2020 at 2:56 pm
          Jon says:
          Hot debate. What do you think?
          Thumb up 10
          Thumb down 12

          For one, he said no such thing. He literally said “better get out and get xyz coverage if you expect coverage for self defense”. For two, the article very clearly outlines a case that is very clearly NOT self defense, so why bring up self defense? The criminal act mentioned was definitively not self defense. For three? Jack is a noted bigot and racist. I have interacted with him dozens of times over the last year.

          • July 1, 2020 at 6:46 pm
            Craig Winston Cornell says:
            Like or Dislike:
            Thumb up 10
            Thumb down 7

            You call everyone you disagree with is a racist. And you haven’t met any single one of them.

            You are the archetype for someone who makes the term “racism” meaningless.

          • July 1, 2020 at 7:18 pm
            Jon says:
            Hot debate. What do you think?
            Thumb up 9
            Thumb down 14

            Not true. I only call racists racists. You are a racist. Jack is a racist. A LOT of Trump’s supporters are racists (you know there are actual nazis on your side right? Yeah, never like bringing that up do you?). I don’t need to meet them. I’ve argued with you on these boards literally hours and hours over the last year. If you think someone who has spent as much time as I’ve spent listening to your BS can’t determine if you’re actually a racist or not, then you’re a racist and an idiot.

            You are just the archetype for another racist Trump idiot. You know you’re wrong about so much but you’ll never admit it, because at your core you’re weak.

  • July 1, 2020 at 2:39 pm
    Cindy says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 6
    Thumb down 3

    This was a hate crime, and should have been charged that way.

  • July 3, 2020 at 11:40 am
    Common Sense says:
    Like or Dislike:
    Thumb up 9
    Thumb down 8

    You are robbing your employer of work hours Jon. I hope he catches you and sends you on your way.



Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*