Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • 2024 P/C Combined Ratio Best in More Than a Decade
  • Judge Backs 17% State Farm Rate Hike in California
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

JPMorgan, State Street Quit Climate Group, BlackRock Steps Back

By Simon Jessop and Ross Kerber | February 16, 2024
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article

JPMorgan Chase’s and State Street’s investment arms on Thursday both quit a global investor coalition pushing companies to rein in climate-damaging emissions, while BlackRock said it has transferred its membership to its international arm, limiting its involvement.

The decisions together remove nearly $14 trillion of total assets from efforts to coordinate Wall Street action on tackling climate change and came after the coalition, known as Climate Action 100+, or CA100+, asked signatories to take stronger action over laggards.

Financial firms have faced growing pressure from Republican politicians over their membership of such groups, amid accusations that committing to shared action could be a breach of antitrust law or fiduciary duty.

None of the firms cited politics among their motivations. A spokesperson for State Street Global Advisors (SSGA), which manages $4.1 trillion, said the new priorities set by CA100+ threatened its ability to act independently.

The priorities, adopted last June, call for CA100+ signatories to engage with policymakers and for some to publish details on their talks with companies towards the goal of getting them to lower emissions to zero on a net basis by 2050.

The changes, however, were “not consistent with our independent approach to proxy voting and portfolio company engagement,” said State Street spokesperson Randall Jensen.

JPMorgan’s fund arm said it had decided not to renew its membership of CA100+ after building up its own investment stewardship capabilities. The Financial Times first reported the news. The unit manages $3.1 trillion.

BlackRock said it is no longer a member of the CA100+ but rather has shifted its membership in CA100+ to BlackRock International.

“As BlackRock made clear when signing up as a member of CA100+ in 2020, at all times the firm maintains independence acting on behalf of clients, including in choosing which issuers to engage with, and how to vote proxies,” the company said in a press release. It also said it would add a new engagement and proxy voting option to give clients a way to prioritize climate goals.

BlackRock’s move effectively removes $6.6 trillion, or two-thirds of its total assets, from the pool represented by CA100+.

Kirsten Spalding, vice president of the Ceres Investor Network, which oversees the CA100+’s North American efforts, said the group had expected some signatories to leave as it adopted its new priorities, and that it would continue its efforts despite the loss of the big asset managers.

“We knew that the focus on making sure there was movement from certain companies was going to be uncomfortable for some investors,” Spalding said in an interview.

Notable Absence

Before Thursday, 13 firms had left CA100+ over the years, including Walter Scott & Partners and Loomis Sayles. But its overall membership has grown to more than 700 firms including 60 new ones that joined in the fall, a spokesperson said.

A notable absence is the world’s second biggest manager, Vanguard, which never joined and, in late 2022, dropped out of another well-known climate grouping, the Net Zero Asset Managers (NZAM) initiative. Vanguard also cited independence concerns, as did a number of insurers who left a sibling organization.

Richard Fields, consultant for leadership advisory firm Russell Reynolds Associates, said the departures are in line with how many companies have grown less vocal about environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues even as they continue to see benefits in an energy transition and diverse workforces.

The development puts groups like CA100+ “at a crossroads,” he said. “Do they want to keep being more vocal and aggressive? Or do they follow the markets and be a little less aggressive?”

While it is hard to say whether the firms caved to political pressure, Fields said, “There’s definitely some overlap in concepts between what the Republican establishment has brought up, and these decisions.”

Should Others Follow?

Fields cited how last March a group of Republican attorneys general co-led by Montana’s Austin Knudsen questioned most of the largest U.S. asset managers about their membership in the industry groups and described what it called “potential unlawful coordination” within CA100+.

In a statement on Thursday sent by a representative, Knudsen called the moves by the three companies “great news” and said, “We need every asset management firm to follow suit.”

Several environmental groups criticized the moves including the Sierra Club, which in a statement described the actions as “Major Asset Managers Cave” to the attacks.

New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who oversees public retirement assets, said his office will take account of the firms’ moves in allocating its investments.

“Climate risk is financial risk. Today BlackRock, JPMorgan, and State Street are choosing to ignore both,” Lander said in a statement. The firms, he said, “are failing in their fiduciary duty and putting trillions of dollars of their clients’ assets at risk.”

Copyright 2025 Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Complaints About Florida Insurers Have More Than Doubled in 5 Years, or Have They?
EPA to Rollback Limits on ‘Forever Chemicals’ in Drinking Water
Despite Backlash From Trump, DEI Hasn’t Disappeared at US Companies
Fire Destroys Mansion on a Former Louisiana Sugar Plantation

Written By Simon Jessop

More From Author

Written By Ross Kerber

More From Author

The most important insurance news,
in your inbox every business day.

Get the insurance industry's trusted newsletter

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: antitrust laws, Climate Action 100+, Climate Change, environmental social and governance (ESG), Fiduciary Liability, Net Zero Asset Managers (NZAM), net zero emissions
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com
More News
EEOC_SealAustin Bar to Pay $42K Over Pregnancy Discrimination Lawsuit
EU to Propose Removing Business Barriers to Enhance Competitiveness Amid US Tariffs
Former Progressive CEO Renwick, 69, Dies
Hack of Contractor Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
More News Features

Read This Next

  • JPMorgan, State Street Quit Climate Group, BlackRock Steps Back
  • Train Strikes Family on Ohio Railroad Bridge, Killing 3
  • US House Bill Reintroduced to Rid Federal Insurance Office of Subpoena Power
  • Acting FEMA Chief Is Ousted After Less Than 4 Months
  • APCIA: Record Shows 'Minimal Complaints' on Hurricane Milton, Helene Claims

Insurance Jobs

  • Outside Property Claim Representative Trainee - El Monte, CA
  • Sales Agent – Charlotte - Charlotte, NC
  • General Liability – Technical Specialist - Centennial, CO
  • Portfolio Manager, Delivery Management - Fort Lee, NJ
  • Professional Services Lead Associate Broker - New York, NY
MyNewMarkets
  • 5 Ways to Prepare for Healthcare Liability Changes in 2025
  • What's Next For Workers' Comp?
  • Soft D&O Market May Come to an End as Risk Complexities Rise
  • Exclusions: Active Assailant Coverage - Oh My!
  • 10 Things to Know About Insuring Boats & Marinas
Claims Journal
  • State Farm Still Wants a 30% Rate Increase in California
  • No NOAA Large-Disaster Data Could Hurt Insurer Grasp of Secondary Perils, Says AM Best
  • Marks & Spencer Says Cyberattack to Cost $403 Million
  • APCIA Says Record Shows 'Minimal Complaints' on Hurricane Milton, Helene Claims
  • Mitchell: Claims Frequency of Battery Electric Vehicles up as Sales Face Tariff Threat
Academy of Insurance education
  • May 22 Commercial Property: Five Bombs and How to Defuse Them
  • June 5 E&O and Hard Markets: How Trying to Keep a Client Might Cause Trouble
  • June 12 Rating AI Tools: Balancing Functionality and Security
  • June 19 Can You Hear Me? Yes, I Am Listening!

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2025 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map