Hedge funds speculating on wildfire insurance claims in California were just dealt a legal blow, after the state adopted new legislation designed to stifle such bets.
Under the law, approved last month by California Governor Gavin Newsom, alternative investment managers buying so-called subrogation claims from insurers would see those transactions voided unless the utilities targeted were given the option to settle on the same terms.
The bill will make it “a lot more difficult” for hedge funds to execute trades on favorable terms, Willis Hon, a partner at Los Angeles-based law firm Nossaman LLP, said in an interview.
“It’s a lot of work finding these funds and developing the deal, drafting the agreement, and doing your due diligence,” he said. “If the electric utility can just step in and exercise the right of first refusal, it makes the whole proposition a lot more risky and uncertain.”
Read More: California Is Proposing New Regulations to Avert Landfill Fires
Subrogation claims have been targeted by hedge funds, private equity firms and other alternative investment managers as a lucrative way to take risk off insurers’ hands. Insurers bringing initial claims against utilities are often keen to offload the risk of potentially long and costly legal battles to third parties. Hedge funds, which generally buy such claims at a discount, take on the risk of pursuing claims, and pocket the gains if they prevail in court.
The model has raised concerns among Californians worried that devastating wildfires are being used as an arena for profiteering at the expense of the California Wildfire Fund, which was created in 2019 to help reimburse fire-related claims. The California Earthquake Authority, which is the administrator of the fund, describes subrogation bets as “opportunistic, profit-driven investment speculation,” and has pledged to take on “hedge funds and other speculators” engaged in such transactions.
The new law has “major implications” for alternative investment managers targeting subrogation, Hon said last month in a written comment co-authored by fellow Nossaman partner, Bradford Kuhn.
Aside from giving utilities the right to settle, the new law also makes it harder for hedge funds to price subrogation deals by attaching a non-disclosure clause, Hon said. The upshot is the market for subrogated claims will probably “shrink,” he said.
In California, such claims have targeted utilities, including Edison International’s Southern California Edison and Pacific Gas & Electric Corp., after they were suspected of being liable for wildfire-related losses.
The market for trading subrogation claims is far from transparent, and hedge funds aren’t required to publish the value of transactions. Notable cases to date include Baupost Group LLC, which in 2020 generated an estimated $1 billion of profits from claims it bought against PG&E, Bloomberg has previously reported.
Hedge funds generally “will not bid on a claim unless they think they can turn it around for a larger profit,” said Mark Toney, executive director of The Utility Reform Network, a ratepayer advocacy group. “We support strategies that keep the hedge fund profiteering structurally out of the system.”
The bill signed by Newsom is part of a sweeping package designed to shore up California’s wildfire prevention, mitigation and funding strategies in the face of increasingly frequent and extreme natural catastrophes. The wildfire fund, partly capitalized by state utilities, has been under strain after a series of devastating fires in Los Angeles earlier this year caused tens of billions of dollars worth of damages.
The California Earthquake Authority initially sought to block the payout of what it has said may end up being “billions of dollars” to fund managers that bought claims tied to recent fires. An earlier version of the bill had proposed a cap on such claims.
Hon said it’s not a given that forcing hedge funds out of the mix will benefit California’s insurance market.
“There’s often negative connotations associated with this profiteering on subrogated claims,” Hon said. But the ability to trade such claims is “very important in the insurance market to allow for adequate liquidity.”
He says it looks like lawmakers tried to “strike that sweet spot of discouraging profiteering, while still allowing for liquidity.”
Spokespeople for the California Earthquake Authority and Newsom’s office declined to comment.
Firms that have traded or bought claims tied to this year’s California fires include New York-based investment banks Cherokee Acquisition and Oppenheimer & Co. Transactions covering claims tied to California’s January fires topped $1 billion by mid-April, Oppenheimer has estimated.
Bradley Max, director at Cherokee Acquisition, said it’s currently “unclear” how the market will react to the new bill. Spokespeople for Oppenheimer and Baupost declined to comment.
| Read More: |
| Hedge Funds Face California Rebuke Over Role in Wildfire Claims
Hedge Funds are Hunting Deals in Risks Too Big for Insurers |
Nicholas Lamparelli, co-founder of the Insurance Advocacy Forum of Florida, said he thinks the new law will delay by 30 days the “inevitable sale” of subrogation claims to third-party investors. That’s because it’s assumed utility companies won’t be in a position to settle.
That delay would still be enough to potentially “reduce the profitability” of selling claims to hedge funds, and force insurers to reassess their strategies, he said.
A spokesperson for the Insurance Information Institute, an industry body, said it views the new legislation as neutral, declining to comment further.
In a joint statement, PG&E, San Diego Gas & Electric Co. and Southern California Edison said the bill will help strengthen California’s wildfire fund, and added that more work is needed to develop permanent and comprehensive solutions to the increasing wildfire risk.
The bill signed by Newsom also expands the California Wildfire Fund. With $21 billion in claims-paying capacity, the vehicle is now set to get an extra $18 billion funded through customer electric bills and utility shareholder contributions.
Analysts at Morgan Stanley said the new legislation eases short-term financial risks for California utilities. The bank upgraded PG&E to “equal weight” and lifted its price targets for both PG&E and Edison International.
Photo: Homes destroyed in the Eaton Fire in Altadena in February. Photographer: Kyle Grillot/Bloomberg
Topics California
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Homeowners Facing Big Deductibles? Mission Says it Has a Buyback Plan for That 
Catastrophe Bonds’ Huge Market Gains Put Reinsurers on Backfoot 
Old Republic to Acquire Small Farmowner Insurer Everett Cash Mutual 
AWS Outage a ‘Moderate Incident,’ Another Near Miss for Insurance Industry 
