La. House Refuses to Relax Statewide Building Code Rules

May 21, 2007

The Louisiana House of Representatives rejected a proposal to loosen statewide building codes enacted after the 2005 storms, concerned that insurers will refuse to write policies for homes built under relaxed standards.

Under current law, construction of a new home requires certification from a licensed inspector that the structure conforms with uniform building codes. The codes were enacted after hurricanes Katrina and Rita, in hopes that building tougher, more wind-resistant homes would reduce damage in future storms and lower property insurance rates.

House members narrowly rejected a bill by Rep. James Fannin that would scale back the inspection requirement, spurred by complaints from north and central Louisiana residents who said the inspectors charge too much and are in short supply.

“We have a situation where we do not have enough certified inspectors to be able to inspect all the work that’s being done in a timely manner,” said Fannin, D-Jonesboro.

Fannin needed support from 53 members but the vote failed in a 52-45 vote. Fannin could bring it up for another vote.

On the Net: House Bill 486 is posted at http://legis.state.la.us/.

Topics Louisiana

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • May 21, 2007 at 5:25 am
    Tired of Critics says:
    That is the problem \"ALL THE MONEY\" \"allocated\"! Where is the actual money? State has to match the FEDS 10% and don\'t have the $$$. Can\'t do anything with promises.
  • May 21, 2007 at 1:41 am
    Tired of LA stories says:
    Anyone else ready for New Orleans and LA in general to look in the mirror and say, \"Maybe I am the problem\". Maybe it\'s time to elect someone who will run the city and stat... read more
  • May 21, 2007 at 12:59 pm
    Tired of a Lazy State says:
    This just shows how much our \"representatives\" do research. First of all, all CBO\'s at the first of the year based their prices upon all the hype. They did not know how muc... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features