Fla. Rejects First Floridian Hike

By | August 31, 2006

Last week when Florida Insurance Commissioner Kevin McCarty issued a notice of intent to deny a 63.2 percent statewide average rate increase for homeowners insurance sought by First Floridian Auto and Home Insurance Company, he was, in effect, issuing the official denial.

Jonathon Kees, assistant director of communication for the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation said that, in this case, intent to deny is equivalent to denial and “now First Floridian has the option to appeal the decision.”

The company writes more than 86,000 policies, with nearly half of them concentrated in five counties in Central and West Central Florida.

The news release announcing the denial quoted McCarty as saying, “I am keenly aware that Floridians have had a very difficult time dealing with higher insurance costs. However, this office will continue to vigorously monitor these requests to make sure that the past two hurricane seasons are not used to unjustly hike rates.”

First Floridian based its request on the increased expense of reinsurance. But state officials said the bid lacked sufficient support.

In May, the insurer submitted a 24.4 percent rate increase request but before state officials rulesd on that First Floridian replaced it with the 63.2 percent filing.

Topics Florida

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • September 5, 2006 at 8:32 am
    temblor says:
    Ah, Broad Generalizations! Make everything sound so much simpler. Of course, we all should have thought of it - only rich people want to upgrade, particularly those to whom $5... read more
  • September 5, 2006 at 7:25 am
    LL says:
    The only people who upgrade are those with disposable income or responsible citizens. Too many people use their homeowners policies as a \"saving account\". Using low income a... read more
  • September 4, 2006 at 5:49 am
    Bill Lockhart says:
    Free Market Mel, you hit the nail on the head. If we want the private market to be writing, then we have to give them rates sufficient to pay their reinsurers. If we don\'t, t... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (15)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features