Floridians Would Pay More to Shore-Up Cat Fund: Survey

December 6, 2011

A new survey finds that 70 percent of Floridians fear being assessed hundreds or thousands of dollars in “hurricane taxes” because the state’s Hurricane Catastrophe Fund may run out of money to pay insurance claims.

The telephone survey of 805 consumers conducted by the American Consumer Institute (ACI) asked consumers if they support or oppose allowing the catastrophe fund to sell “more insurance coverage than it can pay in claims?” Eighty percent opposed.

Nearly half of consumers said they were willing to pay “a little more,” if doing so would avoid insolvencies and higher taxes.

When asked if they would be willing to pay $15 a month more in premiums to make the catastrophe fund financially sound, 55 percent agreed, with 35 percent opposing.

Support for paying somewhat higher premiums to make the hurricane fund financially sound was the greatest among Democrats (62 percent), those using Citizens homeowners insurance (65 percent) and those with incomes between $50,000 and $100,000 per year (63%).

The question about paying higher premiums mirrors legislation filed by Rep. Bill Hager, R-Boca Raton, that addresses the fund’s finances.

The group said its survey was conducted after the state hurricane fund’s chief operating officer, Jack Nicholson, reported that the fund was “dangerously exposed” and billions of dollars short of meeting its insurance obligations, if the state suffered major hurricane damage.

The American Consumer Institute Center for Citizen Research is a Washington, D.C. educational and research organization that supports fiscally responsible government, lower taxes and regulation, and more consumer choice.

Topics Catastrophe Trends Hurricane

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • December 6, 2011 at 6:35 pm
    Anejo says:
    Question, Is re-insurance involved with this CAT fund? In California our big risk is obviously earthquakes. CEA (California Earthquake Authority) inked a deal a couple of mont... read more
  • December 6, 2011 at 3:32 pm
    Holy Moley! says:
    Hillborough agent, your recharacterization of the question is worse than the original one. Your all losses on all risks at the same time scenario is not needed. The Cat Fund s... read more
  • December 6, 2011 at 1:47 pm
    earlybird says:
    Florida's insurance predicament is the perfect illustration of what happens when government takes over insurance. Somebody's got to pay for the exposure to loss. Do Obamacare ... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features