Ruling Could Cost Georgia Firm $459 Million for Junk Faxes

November 6, 2012

The Supreme Court of Georgia ruled against a company accused of partnering with a Texas firm to send more than 300,000 junk faxes to metro Atlanta homes and businesses, meaning it could be liable for a $459 million penalty.

The court this week reversed a lower court decision, ruling against home maintenance firm American Home Services Inc.

Norcross-based A Fast Sign Co., which said its fax machine became tied up with unsolicited ads for the company, sued it in 2003 in what became a class-action lawsuit.

A trial court entered a judgment against American Home Services for $459 million — or $1,500 in damages for each of the 306,000 junk faxes — but an appeals court threw it out. In this Monday’s ruling, the state supreme court sent the case back to the appeals court, saying the company could still remain liable for $459 million, depending on how legal matters in the case are resolved.

A key issue is how the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 is interpreted, and whether it’s necessary to show that faxes sent were actually received.

The appellate court had ruled that the trial court incorrectly applied the federal act, prompting Fast Sign Co.’s appeal to the state supreme court.

In the ruling released Monday, the state supreme court concluded that the federal act “prohibits a person from using a device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone facsimile machine.”

The court’s ruling states that “a sender is liable for the unsolicited advertisements it attempts to send to fax machines, whether or not the transmission is completed or received by the targeted recipient.”

Latest Comments

  • November 6, 2012 at 4:30 pm
    sandman says:
    But is it a pain to get an extra fax or two. Pretty soon a business will be afraid to open. If a business doesn't market it doesn't survive.
  • November 6, 2012 at 4:22 pm
    wvagt says:
    Now if someone will only do something about unsolicited emails from Indonesia, Nigeria, China, etc.
  • November 6, 2012 at 3:00 pm
    yoyowordup says:
    Good, let them move if they are involved in illegal activities.
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features