Attorneys for Yarnell residents who lost their homes in the deadly 2013 Arizona wildfire are asking the Court of Appeals to allow their clients to sue the state.
KJZZ-FM reported that previously homeowners sued the state Forestry Division, but a trial judge dismissed the case concluding the state had no duty to protect the residents’ property.
At a hearing Wednesday an attorney for the state said Arizona is not responsible for protecting everyone who chooses to live adjacent to wilderness.
Plaintiffs’ attorney David Abney says that since the state fought the fire, it voluntarily agreed to try to protect Yarnell. Abney wants the appellate court to give his clients a chance to make their case to a jury.
The 2013 Yarnell wildfire killed 19 firefighters and burned more than 120 homes.
Related:
- Claims From Yarnell Hill Fire Denied by Arizona City
- Arizona’s Yarnell Hill Fire Claims Seek $662 Million
- Suit in Deaths Of 19 Firefighters Settled by Families, Arizona
- 2 Lawsuits Over 2013 Arizona Wildfire Dismissed by Judge
- Settlement Talks Continue in Arizona Wildfire Wrongful Death Case
Topics Lawsuits Homeowners
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Farmers Insurance Plans Historic, Rapid Expansion of Agency Force 
Depreciation on ACV Is OK, Court Says in Knocking Down Class Action vs. Cincinnati 
Florida Man Faked Brain Injury for Years in Attempt to Gain $6M in Insurance 
Sources: US Treasury to Consult With Insurance Regulators on Private Credit Lenders 
