California Commissioner: Data Shows ‘Disturbing’ Disparities in Auto Insurance Discounts

September 24, 2019

The California Department of Insurance on Tuesday released data from an investigation showing what the CDI is calling “wide socioeconomic disparities” in auto insurance group discounts offered to millions of California drivers.

The CDI says the investigation illustrates that many affinity groups disproportionately and adversely affect drivers residing in ZIP codes with lower per capita incomes, lower levels of educational attainment, and larger communities of color.

Some insurers offer lower automobile premium pricing to certain “affinity groups” including white-collar occupations and highly skilled workers, according to CDI data, which shows that one-quarter of Californians receive an affinity group premium reduction ranging from 1.5% to 25.9% depending on the insurer and group.

California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara called the new data “disturbing” after the first affinity group fact-finding hearing in the CDI’s history last week in Los Angeles.

“This disturbing data confirms what we have heard for years, that auto group discounts do not apply equally across California,” said Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara. “We are evaluating whether insurer affinity group discounts violate state laws, and I am prepared to act to ensure all Californians have access to affordable auto insurance regardless of their income, education, or ethnicity.”

Affinity groups give millions of Californians access to more affordable auto insurance, according to a statement from Mark Sektnan, vice president for the American Property Casualty Insurance Association.

“Over the last 30 years, a wide range of organizations have formed and benefited from affinity groups including labor unions, teachers, small business owners and their employees, fire fighters, and law enforcement, among hundreds of others,” the statement reads. “If affinity groups are restricted, millions of California drivers already in these programs could be forced to pay more for auto insurance. If changes are to be made, more affinity groups should be created to encourage greater access.”

Among the findings released by the CDI:

  • Customers in surveyed affinity groups tend to be in higher income ZIP codes. Only 26% of Californians in the lowest-earning areas ($22,516 per capita and below) receive group discounts, compared to 55% in the highest-earning areas ($49,070 per capita and above).
  • Those in affinity groups that were surveyed are more likely to reside in ZIP codes with a higher average educational attainment. Only 28% of those living in areas with the lowest number of college degrees receive discounts, compared to 56% for those where half or more have college degrees.
  • Those in affinity groups are more likely to reside in ZIP codes with a predominantly non-Hispanic white population. 47% of persons living in ZIP codes with a large non-Hispanic white population (62% or greater) receive an affinity group discount. Only 29% of those in heavily minority areas (greater than 83%) receive discounts.
  • Three-quarters of those in underserved communities were not in an affinity group, compared to 57% for the rest of the state.

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • September 27, 2019 at 5:41 pm
    FurriePrincess says:
    It is all spelled out in the language of Prop 103 - can't remember exactly (it was passed in the 1980's)... affinity discounts, good driver discounts, etc could not total more... read more
  • September 27, 2019 at 10:38 am
    Smooth says:
    I started my career with the old GMAC Auto Insurance. I can help explain this as we had plenty of groups an individual could receive a discount for being a part of. Say the Cr... read more
  • September 26, 2019 at 9:57 am
    Observor says:
    To answer a previous question: Firefighters are generally better homeowner risks because they have the knowledge to adjust their home to prevent non-weather related losses and... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (8)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


More News
More News Features