East News
Same-Sex Couple Cites Loss of Consortium in Conn. Med-Mal Suit
July 19, 2006
A same-sex couple has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit that their attorneys say is the first of its kind since Connecticut started allowing gay couples to enter into civil unions.
Margaret Mueller and Charlotte Stacey are suing two doctors, accusing them of treating Mueller for ovarian cancer when she actually had cancer of the appendix. They contend Mueller underwent years of devastating chemotherapy treatments while the real cancer spread.
"I think it's any patient's worst fear that everything they're doing to treat themselves is for naught,'' said Joshua Koskoff, an attorney for the couple.
Connecticut's civil union law, passed last year, allowed Stacey also to sue for the harm to her relationship, known as a loss of consortium claim, Koskoff said. Before the law, only married couples could seek compensation, attorneys said. The civil union law gave gay couples the same legal rights as heterosexual married couples in Connecticut.
"The victims of malpractice are rich and poor, gay and straight, Democrat and Republican,'' Koskoff said. "If that's the case, the law shouldn't discriminate in the way it treats victims of malpractice.''
Attorneys for the doctors, Iris Wertheim and Isidore Tepler, denied the allegations. They say the doctors provided appropriate care for a complex illness.
Eric Stockman, Wertheim's attorney, said he does not plan to challenge Stacey's right to be added to the lawsuit.
Mueller and Stacey were domestic partners for 21 years and were joined in a civil union on Nov. 12, 2005, according to the lawsuit.
The original lawsuit was filed earlier this year on Mueller's behalf. The new lawsuit was amended in Stamford Superior Court to seek damages on Stacey's behalf as well.
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| Por su escote cada vez que ella contacto fÃsico. |
rozwoddody |
Jul 17, 2007, 9:19 pm |
| Amatoriali photos |
ClapekDodki |
Jul 17, 2007, 3:09 am |
| RE: downloadable pda pokemon games |
steven |
Feb 13, 2007, 4:15 am |
| downloadable pda pokemon games |
Amanda |
Jan 31, 2007, 2:13 pm |
| RE: ecran%2Bpda%2Breparation |
Enough with the spam |
Jan 30, 2007, 12:53 pm |
| RE: Gay Parents - Not Tragic |
Realist |
Jan 29, 2007, 10:20 am |
| Gay Parents - Not Tragic |
I Wish |
Jul 25, 2006, 9:44 am |
| malpractice? |
question |
Jul 24, 2006, 2:04 pm |
| RE: RE: What is the problem here? |
Pat |
Jul 21, 2006, 8:16 am |
| The Working Crowd |
Just Tired |
Jul 20, 2006, 4:33 pm |
| RE: RE: What is the problem here? |
Scott Romoser |
Jul 20, 2006, 3:38 pm |
| RE: RE: What is the problem here? |
SEPARATE Church & State |
Jul 20, 2006, 3:38 pm |
| RE: What is the problem here? |
Pat |
Jul 20, 2006, 3:26 pm |
| What is the problem here? |
Much Ado About Nothing |
Jul 20, 2006, 3:12 pm |
| RE: What is the problem here? |
Pat |
Jul 20, 2006, 2:33 pm |
| What is the problem here? |
Much Ado About Nothing |
Jul 20, 2006, 2:08 pm |
| RE: same sex = XX |
SEPARATE Church & State |
Jul 20, 2006, 1:55 pm |
| same sex = XX |
Who made you God? |
Jul 20, 2006, 1:40 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Read the Bible, enuf said |
SEPARATE Church & State |
Jul 20, 2006, 1:28 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Wheels |
Jul 20, 2006, 1:00 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Read the Bible, enuf said |
Pat |
Jul 20, 2006, 12:57 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Read the Bible, enuf said |
This is what is wrong today |
Jul 20, 2006, 11:58 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Read the Bible, enuf said |
Pat |
Jul 20, 2006, 11:21 am |
| RE: RE: Read the Bible, enuf said |
SEPARATE Church & State |
Jul 20, 2006, 11:04 am |
| RE: Read the Bible, enuf said |
Pat |
Jul 20, 2006, 9:59 am |
| RE: Read the Bible, enuf said |
Ignorant is as ignorant does |
Jul 20, 2006, 9:35 am |
| Read the Bible, enuf said |
Not Christian |
Jul 20, 2006, 9:31 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Just Tired |
Jul 20, 2006, 8:50 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
P:at |
Jul 20, 2006, 7:51 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Read the Bible, enuf said |
Jul 19, 2006, 6:33 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
|
Jul 19, 2006, 4:02 pm |
| Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Scott Romoser |
Jul 19, 2006, 3:11 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Pat |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:49 pm |
| RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Question |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:47 pm |
| RE: RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Misty Meanor |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:45 pm |
| RE: RE: Same-Sex lawsuit |
Scott Romoser |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:45 pm |
| RE: Same-Sex lawsuit |
sleepydogg |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:42 pm |
| RE: RE: Same sex couple sues |
Bob Laublaw |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:40 pm |
| RE: Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Pat |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:30 pm |
| Same-Sex Lawsuit |
Question |
Jul 19, 2006, 2:17 pm |
| Same-Sex lawsuit |
Scott Romoser |
Jul 19, 2006, 1:22 pm |
| RE: Same sex couple sues |
Pat |
Jul 19, 2006, 1:16 pm |
| Same sex couple sues |
One reason why not... |
Jul 19, 2006, 12:50 pm |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article