East News
Insurer Reported to Pay $20 Million to Settle Bad Faith Claim in Pa.
July 2, 2007
An insurer has agreed to pay $20 million in what is believed to be the state's richest settlement of a bad faith claim.
According to the plaintiff's attorney, Robert Mongeluzzi of Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesk, Princeton Insurance Co. has agreed to the $20 million in mediation of a bad faith claim filed in Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas.
Princeton did not admit liability in the settlement, Mongeluzzi said.
The case involved a road worker who was paralyzed after being struck by a drunk driver who left a tavern that Princeton insured.
The $20 million is in addition to the $1 million Princeton was previously required to pay under the limits on the tavern's $1 million insurance policy after it lost its appeals on the dram shop case.
Joseph Tuski was left a quadriplegic when a car driven by Michael Petaccio struck him as he directed traffic on Jan. 17, 2001, in Warminster. Petaccio had just left the Ivyland Cafe.
A jury awarded Tuski, who was 31 at the time of the crash, $75 million, an award that a judge later cut in half. But that large award was never paid because the tavern had only $1 million in insurance.
The tavern assigned its rights to Tuski, who sued Princeton Insurance Co. for bad faith, charging that the insurer failed to negotiate a settlement within the policy's $1 million limits after the verdict.
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| RE: RE: RE: bad faith |
We finally got a little relief |
Jul 11, 2007, 2:10 pm |
| RE: Get the facts before you comment |
wudchuck |
Jul 10, 2007, 2:02 pm |
| Get the facts before you comment |
|
Jul 10, 2007, 12:05 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith |
David Williams |
Jul 9, 2007, 11:18 pm |
| RE: bad faith |
wudchuck |
Jul 9, 2007, 11:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: bad faith |
farful mctavish |
Jul 9, 2007, 9:49 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: bad faith |
David Williams |
Jul 9, 2007, 9:39 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith |
farful mctavish |
Jul 9, 2007, 9:30 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith |
tim |
Jul 9, 2007, 9:24 pm |
| RE: bad faith |
wudchuck |
Jul 9, 2007, 8:26 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith |
adjuster |
Jul 9, 2007, 7:56 pm |
| RE: bad faith |
wudchuck |
Jul 9, 2007, 7:06 pm |
| bad faith |
clm mgr |
Jul 9, 2007, 12:36 pm |
| RE: Could it be??? |
No Longer "Big Insurance" |
Jul 9, 2007, 12:35 pm |
| Could it be??? |
Stowers? |
Jul 9, 2007, 11:40 am |
| Host Liquor or Liquor Liab Form |
ad |
Jul 9, 2007, 11:34 am |
| RE: Some off you are confused |
wudchuck |
Jul 6, 2007, 6:55 am |
| RE: Some off you are confused - Righ On |
of all people |
Jul 5, 2007, 6:24 pm |
| Some off you are confused. |
Jeff |
Jul 5, 2007, 3:25 pm |
| reading?! |
wudchuck |
Jul 4, 2007, 7:12 am |
| RE: RE: Am I reading this right? |
tim |
Jul 4, 2007, 6:12 am |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? |
Farful McTavish |
Jul 3, 2007, 6:24 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: LOWBALL? |
wudchuck |
Jul 3, 2007, 4:48 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 |
Mike |
Jul 3, 2007, 4:07 pm |
| RE: RE: homework / Happy 4 |
Rubeus Hagrid |
Jul 3, 2007, 2:15 pm |
| RE: homework / Happy 4 |
Huh? |
Jul 3, 2007, 1:23 pm |
| homework / Happy 4 |
|
Jul 3, 2007, 12:00 pm |
| RE: LOWBALL? |
|
Jul 3, 2007, 11:45 am |
| RE: RE: LOWBALL? |
steven |
Jul 3, 2007, 8:37 am |
| RE: LOWBALL? |
Farful McTavish |
Jul 2, 2007, 10:31 pm |
| LOWBALL? |
wudchuck |
Jul 2, 2007, 10:19 pm |
| RE: RE: bad |
; |
Jul 2, 2007, 6:57 pm |
| RE: RE: bad faith |
FAITH IN THAT. |
Jul 2, 2007, 6:55 pm |
| RE: RE: Am I reading this right? |
steven |
Jul 2, 2007, 3:11 pm |
| RE: bad faith |
Of All People |
Jul 2, 2007, 3:10 pm |
| RE: Am I reading this right? |
NYUND |
Jul 2, 2007, 2:58 pm |
| RE: Am I reading this right? |
Ken |
Jul 2, 2007, 2:57 pm |
| Am I reading this right? |
Confused |
Jul 2, 2007, 2:34 pm |
| bad faith |
Farful McTavish |
Jul 2, 2007, 2:04 pm |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article