Mass. AG Proposes Limiting Amount of Mandatory Flood Insurance for Homeowners

October 16, 2013

In an effort to assist homeowners facing significant flood insurance increases due to FEMA’s updated and expanded flood zone maps, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley and the House Speaker Robert DeLeo have filed state legislation today to cap the amount of flood insurance mortgage lenders may require of homeowners.

The proposed legislation, An Act Relative to Flood Insurance, would prohibit creditors from requiring homeowners to purchase flood insurance in an amount that exceeds the outstanding balance of their mortgage, requires coverage for contents, or includes a deductible of less than $5,000.

Tying the amount of coverage to the outstanding mortgage balance, instead of the replacement value of the home, would lower premiums for the homeowners impacted by the new change. Homeowners would still have the option of purchasing a greater amount of insurance.

These new flood insurance changes are going to devastate many families and businesses in our coastal communities,” Coakley said.

“We continue to urge the federal government to delay implementing these changes until they’ve followed all the steps required by law,” said. “In the meantime, this state legislation can help mitigate the impact of these costs on families and businesses. I want to thank Speaker DeLeo for his leadership on this issue, and also thank Representatives Cantwell and Bradley and Senator Hedlund for continuing to shine a light on the impact of these significant policy changes.”

DeLeo said that as Massachusetts’ Speaker of the House and a representative of a coastal community, he has become increasingly concerned about the changes being implemented by FEMA regarding flood insurance.

“My priority is protecting Massachusetts businesses and families, whom Washington’s new system puts into peril. I am pleased to work with Attorney General Coakley to do what we can to resolve this problem at a state level,” DeLeo said.

The proposed legislation would require banks to provide a notice to homeowners, before paying for federally-mandated flood insurance, explaining that insurance coverage tied to the outstanding mortgage amount will only protect the current mortgage interest, and may not be sufficient to pay for repairs or property loss after a flood.

In response to the devastating impact of the new federal policy upon homeowners, Coakley has already called for a delay in the implementation of flood insurance hikes under the Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012. In a letter to Congress sent earlier this month, Coakley requested that the new bill be delayed until FEMA complies with Congress’ mandate to undertake an affordability review and a peer review of the new flood zone maps.

Insurance rates under the redrawn maps will not only increase for those already in the flood plain, but many homeowners and small businesses will be required to buy flood insurance for the first time. Some are now required to purchase flood insurance at costs of $10,000 and up.

By eliminating various federal subsidies in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and requiring the redrawing and expansion of flood zone maps, Biggert-Waters will pose harsh economic consequences for many homeowners and small businesses in Massachusetts and across the country, according to the Massachusetts attorney general’s office.

Flood insurance is compulsory for property owners with mortgages located in certain zones on Flood Insurance Rate Maps. These homeowners and businesses have no choice, nor do the banks that service their mortgages, but to have flood insurance. Even properties in the new flood zones that do not have mortgages may still be affected, due to heightened building requirements or lower market demand for those properties.

Source: Massachusetts attorney general’s office

 

Subscribe Like this article?
Subscribe to our free email newsletter.

Latest Comments

  • October 23, 2013 at 11:18 am
    jack says:
    Libby- "it should be provided" ??? You mean paid for by someone else right? You do know the government doesn't make a profit on anything it does right??? You are so compassion... read more
  • October 22, 2013 at 12:13 pm
    FFA says:
    we send too much $$$$ to foreign nations for the country to be able to afford Free HealthCare.
  • October 22, 2013 at 12:12 pm
    FFA says:
    I survived the 08/08 floods with out a drop... That was the 100 year high water mark in my neck of the woods. I'll take my chances. floods that went on in Spring, 2013 survive... read more
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features