Uber Called ‘Criminal Enterprise’ by Philadelphia Cab Owners

By | December 29, 2014

Uber Technologies Inc., facing a legal backlash as it expands globally, was called a “criminal enterprise” in a lawsuit by Philadelphia cab companies seeking to block the on-demand car service from operating in the city.

“Not since the days of bootlegging has there been a criminal enterprise so brazen and open as to attract hundreds of millions of dollars in investment from investment bankers and to operate in blatant violation of federal and state law as the Uber enterprise,” Checker Cab Philadelphia Inc. and other cab companies said in a federal court complaint on Dec. 23.

The Philadelphia cab companies contend the only taxis allowed to operate in the city are those that have an official certificate of public convenience and a medallion valued at as much as $520,000. Since the Uber drivers don’t have such a certificate and they don’t comply with local rules for vehicle and driver safety, the service is illegal, according to the lawsuit.

“Uber will vigorously defend the rights of riders to enjoy competition and choice, and for drivers to build their own small businesses,” Taylor Bennett, a spokesman for the San Francisco- based company, said in an e-mailed statement.

Lawsuits against Uber, Lyft Inc. and other car-booking companies have mounted this year as they seek to crack open the U.S. taxi and limousine market, estimated by IbisWorld Research to be an $11 billion industry. Uber, founded in 2009, is the most highly valued U.S. technology startup. The company raised $1.2 billion earlier this month at a valuation of $40 billion.

The case is Checker Cab Philadelphia Inc. v. Uber Technologies Inc., 14-cv-07265, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia).

Related Articles:
Lyft Gets Pennsylvania Regulatory Nod, Except in Philadelphia
Uber Faces Challenge with Driver Screening Internationally
Massachusetts Gov. Patrick Seeks Rules on Rideshare Firms
Uber Facing Roadblocks, Controversies in U.S. and Abroad
Uber Driver Who Struck and Killed Girl in San Francisco Crosswalk Charged

Latest Comments

  • January 2, 2015 at 1:53 pm
    Hmmmm says:
    Hi mikey says --- I big point is that the Taxi cabs must pay huge fees and follow a lot of regulations including insurance. Uber pays little and when they don't like a rule -... read more
  • December 31, 2014 at 9:54 pm
    boonedoggle says:
    If the buggy whip industry was granted similar injunctive relief against the auto manufacturers we wouldn't have our automobile insurance industry as we wouldn't have cars!
  • December 31, 2014 at 1:42 pm
    mikey says:
    Good and quick response InsGuy. That is exactly what is happening. But I also agree that the taxi cab way can be changed and Uber/Lynx are helping the discussion on change.
See all comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features