National News
Cracker Barrel Restaurant Chain Sues Insurers Over Harassment Claims
By Rose French
March 26, 2007
Restaurant chain Cracker Barrel is suing two of its insurance carriers, claiming they did not reimburse the company after it settled sexual and racial harassment claims for $2 million.
The lawsuit filed last week in U.S. District Court in Nashville alleges Cincinnati Insurance Co. and Houston Casualty Co. violated contracts with Cracker Barrel Old Country Stores Inc.
Women who worked at three Cracker Barrel restaurants in Illinois filed a federal lawsuit against the company in 2004 claiming sexual harassment and racial discrimination by employees and managers.
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission joined the women as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which alleged the women were groped by male employees, subjected to obscene and racist jokes and shown pornographic pictures at the restaurants. The women said bosses laughed at them when they complained.
Cracker Barrel says it requested last March that the insurance companies settle the lawsuit for $2 million, but the insurers say that they weren't obligated to do so under policies signed with Cracker Barrel.
Cracker Barrel's lawsuit alleges that the carriers "consistently denied their insurance policy obligations by refusing to reimburse'' the company.
"Most if not all of these claims do not fall within the coverage period of the policy,'' said Joan Shevchik, spokeswoman for Cincinnati Insurance, "We are reviewing this matter with our attorneys and will file a formal response in due course.''
Representatives with Houston Casualty did not immediately comment.
Cracker Barrel said in a released statement last Friday that the lawsuit "outlines our position that two insurance companies are not honoring the contractual commitments they made with our company.
"Although we consider litigation to be a last resort, it's our responsibility to protect our business interests.''
Cracker Barrel has in the past faced lawsuits and federal inquiries over complaints of refusing to serve black customers, discriminating against minority workers and firing gay employees. The company has taken steps to rebuild its folksy image and reach out to minorities.
Cracker Barrel in 2004 agreed to pay $8.7 million to settle federal lawsuits in Georgia that alleged black customers were subjected to racial slurs, denied service or segregated in smoking sections.
The company also settled a Justice Department lawsuit the same year with similar claims by agreeing to a number of operational changes but without admitting wrongdoing or paying fines or penalties.
Cracker Barrel, which is a subsidiary of CBRL Group Inc., is based in Lebanon, a Nashville suburb. It operates about 550 Cracker Barrel Old Country Store restaurants and gift shops in 41 states.
Cracker Barrel shares rose 6 cents to close at $50.37 on the Nasdaq Stock Market last Friday.
___
On the Net:
Cracker Barrel: http://www.crackerbarrel.com
Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article
| Subject |
Posted By |
Posted On |
| RE: Walter, Walter, Walter |
Walter Jones |
Apr 3, 2007, 4:36 pm |
| Walter, Walter, Walter |
Jewel |
Apr 3, 2007, 3:20 pm |
| RE: Aren't we too old to make things up? |
Walter Jones |
Apr 3, 2007, 2:57 pm |
| Aren't we too old to make things up? |
Chad Balaamaba |
Apr 3, 2007, 8:57 am |
| Aren't we too old to make things up? |
Jewel |
Apr 3, 2007, 7:43 am |
| we don't decorate with shoes |
C. Barrel |
Apr 2, 2007, 4:42 pm |
| hey, wasn't it shoe comments ... |
chad balaamaba |
Apr 2, 2007, 4:30 pm |
| RE: Big Insurance (if that's your real posting name) |
Walter Jones |
Apr 2, 2007, 3:58 pm |
| Big Insurance (if that's your real posting name) |
Jewel |
Apr 2, 2007, 3:17 pm |
| Scorekeeper |
Big Insurance |
Apr 2, 2007, 3:06 pm |
| Love Connection |
Chuck Woolery |
Apr 2, 2007, 2:27 pm |
| RE: RE: Big Insurance |
Scorekeeper |
Apr 2, 2007, 2:00 pm |
| RE: Big Insurance |
Jewel |
Apr 2, 2007, 1:51 pm |
| Caffeine |
Big Insurance |
Apr 2, 2007, 1:42 pm |
| Big Insurance |
Jewel |
Apr 2, 2007, 12:02 pm |
| Rosie O'Grady |
Big Insurance |
Apr 2, 2007, 11:37 am |
| RE: GO to Frickin' Work already |
|
Apr 2, 2007, 11:24 am |
| To Big Insurance |
Jewel |
Apr 2, 2007, 11:21 am |
| GO to Frickin' Work already |
King of Insurance |
Apr 2, 2007, 11:20 am |
| What did you say your name was? |
Big Insurance |
Apr 2, 2007, 11:04 am |
| Wait a minute... |
Reason |
Mar 29, 2007, 5:59 pm |
| Rights on the Job |
Straight but not narrow |
Mar 29, 2007, 8:34 am |
| RE: I'm sorry Jewel. I was wrong and you were right |
Jewel |
Mar 28, 2007, 3:58 pm |
| I'm sorry Jewel. I was wrong and you were right |
Tom |
Mar 28, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| RE: RE: You're a troll? |
Mary B. |
Mar 28, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| RE: You're a troll? |
B |
Mar 28, 2007, 8:46 am |
| You're a troll? |
Jewel |
Mar 28, 2007, 8:16 am |
| RE: RE: RE: Free speech vs. hate speech |
B |
Mar 27, 2007, 5:04 pm |
| RE: RE: Free speech vs. hate speech |
Troll |
Mar 27, 2007, 4:19 pm |
| RE: Free speech vs. hate speech |
B |
Mar 27, 2007, 3:49 pm |
| Correction... |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:52 pm |
| To address Tom's "points" |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:50 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Well genius... |
Mark J. |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:42 pm |
| RE: Try making a good point... |
Tom |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:31 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: To B (or not to B)... |
B |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:25 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Well genius... |
B |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:23 pm |
| Now that they've eliminated some deviants... |
Chad Balaamaba |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:17 pm |
| What? |
Brad Pitt |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:14 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Uh oh, you're normal - you have no rights |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:11 pm |
| RE: RE: To B (or not to B)... |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:08 pm |
| Try making a good point... |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:07 pm |
| RE: RE: Uh oh, you're normal - you have no rights |
Mary B. |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:06 pm |
| RE: To B (or not to B)... |
B |
Mar 27, 2007, 2:04 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Well genius... |
Rosie |
Mar 27, 2007, 1:57 pm |
| To B (or not to B)... |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 1:55 pm |
| Ok, now I get it! |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 1:51 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: RE: Well genius... |
B |
Mar 27, 2007, 1:38 pm |
| RE: RE: RE: Well genius... |
Tom |
Mar 27, 2007, 1:33 pm |
| I take back the word stupidity... |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 1:14 pm |
| Well genius... |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 1:12 pm |
| The laws of nature and of nature's God |
Tom |
Mar 27, 2007, 12:53 pm |
| Question for Tom |
Jewel |
Mar 27, 2007, 12:45 pm |
| RE: Uh oh, you're normal - you have no rights |
Tom |
Mar 27, 2007, 11:07 am |
| Uh oh, you're gay - well you are SO FIRED! |
N. This DayandAge? |
Mar 27, 2007, 10:24 am |
| RE: RE: RE: They Made Their Beds, Now They Can |
Tyrone |
Mar 27, 2007, 8:42 am |
| RE: RE: They Made Their Beds, Now They Can |
Gary |
Mar 26, 2007, 6:27 pm |
| Cracker Barrel |
MV |
Mar 26, 2007, 3:33 pm |
| Who cares, just as long as they keep makin' gravy |
Chad Balaamaba |
Mar 26, 2007, 2:27 pm |
| RE: They Made Their Beds, Now They Can |
Tom |
Mar 26, 2007, 12:51 pm |
| RE: They Made Their Beds, Now They Can |
De bunking the left |
Mar 26, 2007, 12:48 pm |
| They Made Their Beds, Now They Can "Lie" In It |
Rosie |
Mar 26, 2007, 11:47 am |
Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article