Southeast News

Sen. Lott Undecided Whether to Settle or Go to Trial On Katrina Claim

U.S. Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., who sued State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. for refusing to cover Hurricane Katrina's damage to his Gulf Coast home, said last week that he is weighing a settlement offer from the company but hasn't ruled out a trial for his case.

Advertisement

State Farm agreed in January to pay about $80 million to up to 640 policyholders, including Lott, who sued the Bloomington, Ill.-based insurer. Most of those policyholders have accepted the settlement and received their money, but Lott's case remains on track for a trial in federal court in June.

"We haven't rejected a settlement, but we haven't come to an agreement on one,'' the Mississippi Republican said in an interview in the Capitol.

"This has always been about a lot more than me,'' he added. "I'm still looking at everything that's going on. I haven't made a decision to go forward with a trial, or not to.''

Richard "Dickie'' Scruggs, one of Lott's lawyers, said that he plans to try the case but knows that Lott hasn't ruled out a settlement.

"Not yet, but there are some things he has to be satisfied with first, and we aren't there yet,'' the lawyer said, adding that Lott's reluctance to accept a settlement "ain't about the money.''

Lott, whose beachfront home in Pascagoula was demolished by the Aug. 29, 2005, storm, said he would be "risking everything'' with a trial.

"They've been so arrogant,'' he said of State Farm. "They probably think well, 'We'll just show him,' but I'm not ready for a settlement or a proceeding at this point, so we'll see how things go.''

State Farm spokesman Phil Supple declined to comment on Lott's lawsuit, but he noted that the company reached an agreement this week with Mississippi Insurance Commissioner George Dale to re-examine and possibly pay more than 35,000 policyholder claims after Katrina.

"State Farm is still very interested in resolving outstanding claims with settlements,'' he said.

A court-ordered settlement conference for Lott's case is scheduled for Tuesday in Gulfport. A federal magistrate has instructed both sides to submit memos outlining a "candid appraisal of the respective positions, including possible settlement figures.''

Neither State Farm nor Lott's lawyers have disclosed how much the company has offered to pay Lott to settle his suit.

U.S. Rep. Gene Taylor, a Democrat whose home in Bay St. Louis, Miss., was destroyed by Katrina, is among Scruggs' clients who have settled their suits against State Farm.

Lott said he hasn't had any contact with State Farm since an adjustor told him in 2005 that the company didn't find any evidence of wind damage to his home. State Farm and other insurers say their policies cover damage from wind but not flood water, including wind-driven storm surge.

"I have heard nothing from that day to this, but I think that they've heard from me a few times,'' said Lott, who has sponsored legislation after Katrina that would end the insurance industry's exemption from antitrust laws.

(Associated Press writer Kasie Hunt in Washington contributed to this report.)

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 4, 2007, 4:19 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Apr 4, 2007, 12:18 pm
To Mary B. Jewel
Apr 2, 2007, 3:09 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Apr 2, 2007, 3:00 pm
RE: Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Def Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... Mary B.
Apr 2, 2007, 2:24 pm
Thank God For Trial Lawyers! Gerry
Apr 2, 2007, 11:33 am
Win & They Appeal: Settle for a Larger sum & Move On Lady Liberty
Mar 31, 2007, 9:01 pm
Meow! Typo is Minor Compared to Contracts Written to Defraud GOD
Mar 30, 2007, 8:11 pm
BTW adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:22 pm
RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 2:19 pm
RE: Putz... Mary B.
Mar 30, 2007, 2:12 pm
Let's look at it adjusterjoe
Mar 30, 2007, 9:17 am
What about Homes that still remain but in pieces ? Homeless without a Slab
Mar 29, 2007, 7:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 5:31 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 5:08 pm
RE: Not the enthusiasm.... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 4:28 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 3:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 3:38 pm
Not the enthusiasm.... Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 2:53 pm
RE: RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 2:14 pm
RE: 295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:58 pm
295,000 settled, 1,000 to go Gill Fin
Mar 29, 2007, 1:54 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Putz... Dale
Mar 29, 2007, 1:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 1:27 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 1:01 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:59 pm
RE: RE: Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:53 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 12:21 pm
RE: Putz... adjusterjoe
Mar 29, 2007, 12:00 pm
Putz... Mark
Mar 29, 2007, 11:52 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:35 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:11 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 5:04 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 5:00 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 4:56 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry dale.gilliland.L932@statefarm.
Mar 28, 2007, 3:15 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:13 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:12 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:10 pm
RE: RE: RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:07 pm
RE: RE: Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:03 pm
RE: Sorry adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:02 pm
RE: RE: RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 3:01 pm
Oh Yeah adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 3:00 pm
Sorry Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:59 pm
RE: RE: Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:58 pm
RE: Dale, a question Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:49 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about th Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:45 pm
Dale, a question adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:41 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the mo adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 2:36 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. Dale
Mar 28, 2007, 2:26 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. RE adjusterjoe
Mar 28, 2007, 1:20 pm
lazy, cheap, and stupid Cliff
Mar 28, 2007, 12:55 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY Dale
Mar 27, 2007, 8:30 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Skit
Mar 26, 2007, 7:44 pm
RE: RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 4:02 pm
RE: RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Chuck
Mar 26, 2007, 3:56 pm
RE: Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Dale
Mar 26, 2007, 3:32 pm
Really, its not about the money. REALLY!!!! Gill Fin
Mar 26, 2007, 3:12 pm
Hmmm Sam
Mar 26, 2007, 1:41 pm