Win Ratio

By | July 18, 2011

A task force of state insurance regulators has recommended that states support legislation to protect agent and broker commissions from the expense cap imposed on health insurers by the new federal healthcare law’s medical loss ratio (MLR). The task force of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners voted to back H.R. 1206, the Professional Health Insurance Advisors Act of 2011, introduced by Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich.

Under the federal law, insurers must spend at least 80 percent of premiums on medical costs and are limited only 20 percent for profits, marketing and administration, which now includes agent and broker fees. The Rogers bill would remove agent and broker fees from the MLR’s administrative calculation. Last year, the NAIC supported a formula that included agent and broker fees in the administrative portion of the MLR. So if it goes along with the task force, it would be shift in policy.

Agents and broker have understandably balked at having their income placed under the MLR’s administrative formula, arguing that insurers will look to cut their fees as a way to stay in compliance and, in fact, many have already begun cutting. A survey by the National Association of Financial Advisors found that 75 percent of insurance brokers have had their fees decrease since MLR was announced.

Now regulators who are closest to their states’ health insurance marketplace have echoed agents’ concerns.

Agents fear they will be marginalized if the MLR formula is not changed.

Agents, who fear they will be marginalized if the formula is not changed, were encouraged by the task force move. “This fix is desperately needed to ensure consumers can continue to rely on trusted health care advisors,” said Charles Symington, Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America.

“This action is good news for America’s health insurance consumers and good news for the Main Street independent insurance agents that consumers rely on,” said Leonard C. Brevik, the National Association of Professional Insurance Agents.

Some consumer groups, however, do not want to see the MLR formula changed, among them Consumer Watchdog. “The insurance regulators who voted for this plan sold consumers in their states down the river by endorsing higher health insurance premiums and millions in lost rebates to benefit their friends in the insurance industry,” said Carmen Balber, Washington director for Consumer Watchdog.

The Obama Administration is unlikely to budge at this point on its MLR position, meaning legislation is the most likely route to change. That seems like an uphill battle given all that Congress has on its plate. But when it comes to politics, never, never underestimate agents’ clout.

Topics Agencies

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal Magazine July 18, 2011
July 18, 2011
Insurance Journal Magazine

Excess, Surplus & Specialty Markets Directory Vol. II – The Industry’s Leading Coverage Placement Directory