Topliff v. Chicago Insurance Co.
(Wash. Court of Appeals, Nov. 15, 2005)
Ruling: The insured, an attorney, had been sued in an underlying action, and his professional liability insurer denied coverage because the claim was not within the definition of “professional service.” The insured sued the insurer and instituted the action by service on the State Insurance Commissioner. However, the Commissioner’s office failed to notify the insurer of the action. The insurer did not appear, and a default was taken. The court vacated the default noting that the insurer was deprived of the opportunity to respond, resulting in a failure of due process.
Albert v. Life Insurance Co. of North America
(Fifth Circuit Court, Dec. 2, 2005)
Bailey v. The Insurance Corp. of NY
(California 9th Circuit Court, Nov. 18, 2005)
Information compiled by Kevin T. Merriman of Goldberg Segalla LLP. Web site: www.goldbergsegalla.com.
Topics Lawsuits
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Five Reasons Why the US Escaped a Hurricane Landfall So Far This Year
Viewpoint: Beware the Rise in Unproven ‘Brittleness Test’ for Roof Shingle Claims
China Accuses US of Orchestrating $13 Billion Bitcoin Hack
Nonstandard Auto Insurers Continue Profit Momentum in 2025: AM Best 


