U.S. Doctors Say Lawsuits Help Guarantee Drug Safety

September 1, 2008

Doctors who run one of the most influential U.S. medical journals are giving the U.S. Supreme Court some unsolicited legal advice about a major case.

Lawsuits can serve as “a vital deterrent” and protect consumers if drug companies do not disclose risks to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration before it approves medicines for use, the editors of the New England Journal of Medicine said in a friend-of-the-court brief. The FDA “is in no position” to guarantee drug safety, the brief said.

At issue is Wyeth v. Levine, a case expected to be heard late this year that could have far-reaching implications for litigation over allegedly harmful drugs, such as the painkiller Vioxx.

Diana Levine, a Vermont guitarist, lost her right arm below the elbow after she was injected with Phenergan, a medicine for nausea, and developed gangrene. She sued the manufacturer, Wyeth, arguing that the company had neglected its duty to warn consumers that such injections could have devastating consequences. The courts in her state agreed, awarding her almost $7 million.

But Wyeth appealed, countering that it was protected from such lawsuits. It argued that the FDA regulatory judgment could not, in affect, be overruled by a state court. FDA scientists had weighed the risks and benefits of Phenergan in approving the drug’s prescribing literature, or label, as a guide for doctors. The FDA was aware of risks associated with injecting some forms of Phenergan, but the label did not specifically warn about the technique used with Levine.

Although the FDA is considered by many “the gold standard” in drug evaluation, the journal editors urged the justices to be skeptical.

“The FDA alone simply lacks the ability to serve as the sole guarantor of drug safety,” the doctors said in a brief. Without the discoveries dredged up by plaintiffs’ lawyers through liability litigation, “the FDA would be stripped of an essential source of information that the agency has consistently relied on when making its regulatory decisions.”

“Even if the FDA is doing the best it can, it simply can’t see the future clearly enough to preempt manufacturers from litigation,” said the journal’s editor, Dr. Jeffrey M. Darien.

Topics Lawsuits USA

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

From This Issue

Insurance Journal Magazine September 1, 2008
September 1, 2008
Insurance Journal Magazine

Salute to Surplus Lines Brokers/NAPSLO; London Report; Top Workers’ Comp Writers