The Washington, D.C.-based American Insurance Association recently voiced strong opposition to Granholm’s proposal to shift hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes onto the insurance industry, arguing it would chill industry job growth and hurt consumers.
“The governor’s tax proposal is just a shell game with few winners and many losers,” said Sean McManamy, assistant vice president AIA’s Midwest region. “Consumers and small businesses will lose as the plan shifts the tax burden onto a select few industries-many of which already pay a disproportionate share of the state’s taxes-and dramatically increases costs for all insurance consumers.”
According to AIA, insurers account for 11 percent of the state’s business taxes and would see their share rise to an estimated 23 percent. “While other states in the Midwest have rolled back premium taxes to promote growth in this vital market segment, this administration has done the opposite,” McManamy said in a statement.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Union Pacific Railroad Fined $304K for Firing Employee During Severe Weather
Uninsurable Future: Managing the Climate-Change-Fueled Home Insurance Crisis
Viewpoint: The ‘Unbundled’ Insurer Emerges in Age of AI as Value Chain Fragments
Two Past Hurricanes, OIR Data Give Idea of What to Expect From Isaias in Florida 


