The New Hampshire Senate’s decision to kill a trial lawyer-supported bill that would have required well-insured defendants with little liability to pay the lion’s share of legal judgments has been hailed as a victory for judicial fairness by the Property Casualty Insurers Association of America.
S.B. 47 would have changed New Hampshire’s civil action fault apportionment system by removing as a “party” any named defendant who had settled before trial.
The bill was an effort by the New Hampshire Trial Lawyer Association to reverse a recent New Hampshire Supreme Court decision clarifying the nature of “party” or “parties” to a lawsuit under the state’s system of joint and several liability and the right of contribution. As a result, parties with large insurance policy limits and little liability would run the risk of a large judgment without any “parties” to share the burden under the joint and several liability determinations and any right of contribution from a joint wrongdoer, according to Frank O’Brien, PCI regional manager. “The New Hampshire Senate prevented a grave consumer injustice by choosing to kill this bill,” he said.
Topics Carriers
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Navigators Can’t Parse ‘Additional Insured’ Policy Wording in Georgia Explosion Case 
Accuweather: Winter Storm to Cause Up to $115B in Damage, Economic Losses 
Hot Sauce Company Sues Manufacturer Over Exploding Bottles 
Kin Moves Into Florida and Texas With Home-Auto Bundle Products From This Issue
