New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Topics New York
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
As AI Agents Go Rogue, Cyber Insurers Are Adapting Their Policies 
AIG Executive Chair and Former CEO Zaffino Set to Exit for Palantir 
Auto and Home Insurance Consumers Getting Used to Using AI: JD Power 
Brightline Lands $350 Million Assured Loan in Case of Bankruptcy 
