New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Topics New York
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
‘Unusual’ Isaias Brings Winds, Downed Trees But Fewer Claims Than Expected 
AI Bubble Risks Worst S&P 500 Crash Since 2008, Strategist Says 
Harbor Emerges From Stealth with $10M Funding to Handle AI-Agent Risk 
AI Models May Soon Self-Replicate Across Smart-Home Devices, Anthropic Warns 
