New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Topics New York
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Viewpoint: Japan’s $550B Bet on America—What it Means for the US Insurance Market
Business Interruption Claims Arising From the Middle East Conflict
Ex-CEO, Ex-CFO of Bankrupt AI Company Charged With Fraud
Carnival Cruise Passenger Served 14 Shots Awarded $300,000 After Fall Down Stairs 

