New York’s top court has rejected a product liability claim against tobacco companies for selling regular cigarettes when they could have used lower levels of tar and nicotine.
The Court of Appeals ruled that lawyers representing the late Norma Rose, who died after smoking regular cigarettes for more than 40 years, failed to prove that “light” cigarettes have the same effects as regulars.
The judges, upholding a midlevel court, say the only “utility” of a cigarette is to gratify a smoker’s desire for a certain experience, and it was unproven that light cigarettes do that as well as regular cigarettes.
The suit named Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Philip Morris USA and other companies.
Topics New York
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Board Calls for US Steel to Address Safety Issues as It Rebuilds Site of Fatal Explosion
Grand Jury Declines to Indict Man in Fatal Shooting at Kentucky State University
CEO Sentenced in Miami to 15 Years in One of the Largest Health Care Fraud Cases
Longtime Motel 6 Spokesman Tom Bodett Settles Lawsuit Against Chain 

