A divided Delaware Supreme Court has ruled against the wife of a former DuPont Co. worker in an asbestos exposure case.
The court ruled 3-to-2 on Monday that Patricia Price could not change a claim of nonfeasance against DuPont into a claim of misfeasance.
Nonfeasance involves the failure to protect someone with whom you have a special relationship and to whom you owe a duty. Misfeasance involves a general affirmative duty to protect others against harm.
The court said Dupont’s failures to prevent Bobby Price from taking asbestos fibers home on his clothing or to warn the Prices about asbestos do not support a claim of misfeasance. It also said Price’s nonfeasance claim must fail because DuPont had no special relationship with her and owed her no legal duty.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
KPMG Australia to Fire Hundreds of Workers as Crisis Deepens 
How One Florida Gas Station Worker Allegedly Defrauded Progressive of $44,700 
Nuclear Verdicts Go Boom, Increase 40.7% in 2025 
A Landmark Supreme Court Ruling Is Upending How America Moves Its Goods 
