Mass. AG Wants to Put Brakes on ‘Excessive’ Homeowners Insurance Rate

November 18, 2011

Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley is urging the State Rating Board to hold a hearing to scrutinize the data insurers use to set homeowners insurance rates in her state.

The Attorney General’s office says it is estimating possible overcharges of half a billion dollars due to what it calls “untested hurricane models” used in determining premiums.

“Untested and unsupported forecast models should not be used to justify rates that are excessive,” said Coakley in a letter sent to the State Rating Board.

“Hurricane models have a significant impact on the premiums paid by all Massachusetts homeowners who could have paid millions in excessive rates as a result. All insurers should be required to demonstrate that these models produce accurate estimates that are appropriate for Massachusetts.”

Homeowners Overcharged?

She says that between 2004 and 2010, rates increased based on the insurers’ hurricane predictions and caused consumers to pay an increase of $2.2 billion, half a billion of which could be overcharges, in her estimates. Massachusetts did not see any hurricanes in that time period. 2011’s Hurricane Irene was downgraded to a tropical storm before it hit Massachusetts.

Most Massachusetts insurers use private prediction models to estimate expected hurricane losses when rating and underwriting a policy.

Coakley claimed in her letter that the insurers are not appropriately detailing how they are using these models. She added that no regulatory body has reviewed most of these models to ensure that they are suitable for use in her state.

Not only are models not being reviewed, Insurance Commissioner Joseph Murphy is allowing the use of models that have been rejected in other states such as Florida, Coakley charged. Historically, these rejected models have inflated expected losses well above actual experience, she said.

Coastal areas have seen the greatest increase in homeowner insurance rates, especially in the Cape and Islands. For many insurers, modeled hurricane loss estimates are as much as 600 percent higher than non-hurricane losses in these areas, according to Attorney General Coakley.

Insurance Group Issues Rebuttal

A national insurance association strongly rebuked Attorney General Coakley’s claims. National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies says Coakley’s statements betray her lack of understanding of catastrophe models.

“The attorney general’s letter demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding regarding the function and use of catastrophe models,” NAMIC stated on Friday.

Insurers use models to get the best estimate of their exposure to catastrophic loss, the group said. “They do this to ensure they will have sufficient capital to pay claims in the event of a catastrophic event, to keep their promises and meet contractual obligations to policyholders.”

Topics Catastrophe Carriers Hurricane Homeowners Massachusetts

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • November 21, 2011 at 4:21 pm
    Rick says:
    Once again an elected official who knows little or nothing about the insurance industry, acturial sciene and predictive modeling. Hurricane prone areas can enjoy 10 years of ... read more
  • November 18, 2011 at 8:58 pm
    mark says:
    she is such a sleeze, she could care less about MA Homeowners its all about sound bites. Is always a socialist in the AG's office apparently we should run our industry like ob... read more
  • November 18, 2011 at 4:00 pm
    dreamer says:
    so.... when the big one hits when she is Govenor, she can bail everyone out with her state money and be the hero all over again! Theres a fox in them there woods in Boston, wa... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (5)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features