The top New York court says property insurance against vandalism includes coverage for malicious damage that isn’t specifically aimed at the insured property.
The ruling comes from a claim by Georgitsi Realty, owner of a four-story apartment building in Brooklyn, against Penn-Star Insurance Co.
The owner says excavation next door cracked the walls and foundations of the building, but those contractors ignored fines and a court order to stop.
In answering questions about New York law for the ongoing federal case, the New York Court of Appeals says acts not specifically directed at a property may be vandalism when they are malicious, with such deliberate disregard for others to be “willful or wanton.”
In a partial dissent, Judge Sheila Abdus-Salaam would exclude malicious acts where damaging property was not the primary intent.
Topics New York
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
AI Savings Misses ‘Should Be Making Executives Uncomfortable,’ Bain Says 
USI Insurance Services Claims Ex-Broker Poached Clients for Own New Agency 
Georgia Brokers and Agents Alarmed After Court Ruling Expands Liability for Them 
Shipper Escapes $41.9M Award for Man Paralyzed When Lights Fell From Pallet on Him 
