The Connecticut Supreme Court is scheduled to hear arguments on whether homeowners’ insurance policies should cover repairs to thousands of homes with crumbling foundations caused by defective concrete.
Justices will hear arguments in three cases Tuesday.
An estimated 35,000 homes in Connecticut and Massachusetts are affected by disintegrating concrete containing pyrrhotite, an iron sulfide that reacts naturally with oxygen and water. Replacing a foundation can cost $100,000 to $200,000.
In one of many lawsuits against insurers for failing to cover the damage, a federal judge earlier this year asked the state high court to better define the word “collapse.”
Insurers argue that policies only cover fixing foundations if homes collapse. Homeowners argue that under a 1987 state Supreme Court ruling, “collapse” also can mean impairment in structural integrity.
Related:
- Head of Connecticut Crumbling Foundations Entity Concerned About Funding Delay
- Head of Crumbling Foundations Fund in Connecticut Says $1B Needed
- Candidate Seeks to File Brief in Connecticut Crumbling Foundations Case
- Connecticut Lawmakers Vote to Add $12 Fee to Help Homeowners
- Court Asked to Define ‘Collapse’ in Connecticut Home Foundations Case
- Connecticut Senator Says Surcharge to Help Homeowners Is Not Dead
- Connecticut Homeowners Ask Legislature for Assistance on Bad Foundations
- Bonding Awarded to Launch Crumbling Foundations Entity in Connecticut
- Connecticut Crumbling Foundations Fund Receives Delayed $19M
Topics Connecticut
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
AI Savings Misses ‘Should Be Making Executives Uncomfortable,’ Bain Says
NC Jury Award for Workers Injured in Wall Collapse May be Largest in State History
Acrisure to Cut 2,250 Employees, Citing Advances in Technology and AI
USI Insurance Services Claims Ex-Broker Poached Clients for Own New Agency 

