Mich. Senate Approves Changes Targeting School Health Costs

September 6, 2007

The Michigan GOP-led Senate narrowly approved bills Tuesday aimed at lowering the health insurance costs of K-12 schools and other public employers, a key change Republicans want in exchange for backing a tax increase.

“There’s got to be an end to this paralysis,” said Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester.

While Democrats still opposed the measure because it is not directly linked to higher tax revenue, Bishop was hopeful the 20-18 vote would get a response from the Democratic-controlled House. Republicans want a tax hike to originate there.

The legislation would let schools, public universities and local governments pool their workers’ health coverage and require public employers to competitively solicit bids for health benefits. The measure could save hundreds of millions of dollars a year in school districts but is controversial because it would open up the claims data of an insurer affiliated with the Michigan Education Association, the state’s largest teachers’ union.

The Michigan Education Special Services Association, or MESSA, provides insurance plans for many K-12 school districts and community colleges.

Democratic Lt. Gov. John Cherry, who earlier Tuesday cast a tie-breaking vote against the legislation before the GOP later got enough votes, said of the pooling legislation: “We can support that reform as long as it’s tie-barred to the revenue package we need.”

Topics Legislation Michigan Politics

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • September 7, 2007 at 9:12 am
    lastbat says:
    Come on people. The government should be competitive in its bidding. Go with the millions saved and forget the rest.
  • September 6, 2007 at 1:20 am
    Disgruntled MI Parent says:
    Cross tying this to higher tax revenues is just a smoke screen.The Democrats are afraid of offending their good friends (and contributors) the MEA. The MESSA is a for profit o... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (2)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features