When the fall resulted from clear ice at a motel side exit you were instructed only to use the following AM because you had a dog which remain unsalted the liabilty remains with the establishment who should of known of the condition not the dog owner unbeknown to him.
Yes but you chose to bring your dog, hence needing to visit the unsalted area. The establishment pointed out it was unsalted and showed resaonable care in telling you that.
Every once in a while we manage to do the right thing.
If only this kind of common sense could be applied to other concepts. Kudos to the MI Supreme Court.
When the fall resulted from clear ice at a motel side exit you were instructed only to use the following AM because you had a dog which remain unsalted the liabilty remains with the establishment who should of known of the condition not the dog owner unbeknown to him.
Yes but you chose to bring your dog, hence needing to visit the unsalted area. The establishment pointed out it was unsalted and showed resaonable care in telling you that.