An auto parts manufacturer with a facility in Plymouth, Michigan, violated federal law when it refused to allow an older, female worker with a disability to re-enter its apprenticeship program, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuit.
According to the lawsuit, an employee at Autokiniton who had over 30 years’ experience in automotive manufacturing, joined the manufacturer’s apprenticeship program in 2018 as the only female apprentice. She performed successfully, despite enduring sex and disability discrimination. The company perceived the employee as a liability, as she sometimes used a cane due to her disability, the EEOC’s suit said.
In March 2020, Autokiniton laid off its workers due to the pandemic. After the layoff, the company allowed men to resume their apprenticeships. It recalled the female employee, but refused allow her to re-enter the apprenticeship program, denying her a higher wage and opportunities for overtime. Instead, the company allowed three younger men to enter the program in 2022 as new apprentices. The company reinstated her as an apprentice in 2025, but then paid her a lower apprentice rate.
Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). The EEOC filed suit (EEOC v. Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC d/b/a Autokiniton, Case No. 2:25-cv-12926) in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan after first attempting to reach a pre-litigation settlement through its administrative conciliation process.
Source: EEOC
Topics Lawsuits Auto Michigan Manufacturing
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Hurricane Forecasts Are Missing the Mark as the Atlantic Stays Calm — So Far 
7 Years of Double-Digit Growth; New Players on Top 25 E&S Insurers List 
AmTrust Expands E&S Division, Spins Off Some MGAs With Blackstone 
Citizens No Longer Winning Most Arbitration Cases. They’re Settling for Next to Nil 
