A New York state appeals court rejected former American International Group Inc. Chairman Maurice “Hank” Greenberg’s bid to dismiss a decade-old lawsuit accusing him of orchestrating an accounting fraud at the insurer.
The court found that the New York attorney general’s claim for Greenberg to disgorge millions of dollars in allegedly ill-gotten bonuses was “legally viable.”
Greenberg, 89, and his co-defendant, former AIG Chief Financial Officer Howard Smith, who also faces the claim, are accused of orchestrating sham transactions at the insurer.
The defendants failed to show the lack of incentive compensation resulting from the sham transactions at AIG, the Appellate Division, First Department ruled.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who is pursuing the lawsuit initially brought by his predecessor, Eliot Spitzer, also seeks to ban the defendants from the securities industry and from serving as officers or directors of public companies.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
One Battle After Another: What TPLF Victory in One State Means for Others 
State Farm Must Give Up Trade Secrets in Claims Lawsuits, but Under Court Review 
Should Parents Be Responsible for Kids Getting Hurt and Killed on E-Bikes? 
A Landmark Supreme Court Ruling Is Upending How America Moves Its Goods 
