MGM Files Suit to Limit Liability for Las Vegas Shooting

July 18, 2018

MGM Resorts International sued the victims of a Las Vegas music festival mass shooting in an effort to block any potential compensation claims against it.

The owner of the Mandalay Bay hotel claims a 2002 federal statute wipes out liability for any company that adopts “anti-terrorism technology,” which it says it did. It asked a federal judge in Nevada for a declaration that the company isn’t liable.

After Stephen Paddock opened fire at festival goers from the Mandalay Bay hotel, killing 58 and wounding about 500, more than 2,500 individuals brought, or threatened to bring, lawsuits against MGM, the company said in its complaint, filed July 13 in Las Vegas federal court.

The casino operator argues that because it hired a company certified by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to provide security at the Route 91 Harvest Festival to “help prevent and respond to mass violence,” it complied with the Support Anti-Terrorism by Fostering Effective Technologies Act, which limits liability arising from mass attacks committed in the U.S. The law “precludes any finding against” MGM and other defendants and bars victims from targeting the companies’ insurance policies as well, according to the suit.

Robert Eglet, a Las Vegas-based lawyer for the shooting victims, told the Las Vegas Review Journal newspaper the suit was misfiled in federal court. Since MGM is incorporated in Nevada, lawsuits over the shooting must be heard in state court and the company’s countersuit amounted to a “blatant display” of judge shopping, he told the paper.

“The federal court is an appropriate venue for these cases and provides those affected with the opportunity for a timely resolution,” Debra DeShong, an MGM spokeswoman, said in a statement. “Years of drawn out litigation and hearings are not in the best interest of victims, the community and those still healing.”

Las Vegas police commanders say Paddock shot festival goers from the windows he broke out of his 32nd-floor suite at the Mandalay. The room was filled with more than 20 automatic weapons. Paddock, 64, killed himself before authorities could capture him. His victims included a U.S. Navy sailor, a California firefighter and an off-duty Las Vegas police officer.

Police haven’t identified Paddock’s motive for opening fire on the crowd.

The case is MGM Resorts International Inc. v. Carlos Acosta, No. 18-cv-01288, U.S. District Court for Nevada.

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Advertisers

Latest Comments

  • July 24, 2018 at 4:19 pm
    Agent says:
    Bad for MGM. They should be sold and another chain brought in to run it. Apparently, they paid off the Sheriff Dept for not revealing what went on there.
  • July 18, 2018 at 5:41 pm
    mr opinion says:
    Good for MGM. Forgive my bluntness but I'm tired of attorneys taking advantage of traumatized people, like finding a deep pocket to point the finger at is some kind of therap... read more
  • July 18, 2018 at 2:41 pm
    Agent says:
    Hey MGM, your employee helped the shooter with his multiple boxes and bags of guns and ammo. Sheriff Dept also should be sued for hiding in the hallway while the shooting was... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (4)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features