Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • State Involvement Should Remain Central to AV Regs
  • Allstate Doubles Q4 Income; Auto UW Income Triples
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement

By Tom Hals | February 11, 2021
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article
  • 1 Comment

Facebook Inc. may have paid $4.9 billion more than the maximum penalty it faced under a settlement agreement with regulators related to allegations it mishandled user privacy, according to a Wednesday court ruling.

The information made public by a Delaware judge who gleaned it from a “white paper” prepared by a law firm advising Facebook’s board of directors as they debated a proposed $5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission. That agreement also protected Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg.

Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights of the Court of Chancery cited the paper by Gibson Dunn attorneys in his ruling directing Facebook to turn over documents to shareholders who are trying to determine if Facebook overpaid to protect Zuckerberg.

“The documents already produced provide no insight into why Facebook would pay more than its (apparently) maximum exposure to settle a claim,” said Slights in the ruling. Shareholders, he said, were “right to question whether internal communications among Facebook fiduciaries might shed light on the Board’s thinking in this regard.”

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The July 2019 deal resolved allegations Facebook mishandled user privacy. The company did not admit wrongdoing.

Slights said Facebook faced a maximum penalty of about $104 million, according to the Gibson Dunn paper.

The FTC did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

Joel Fleming, an attorney for the Facebook shareholders, told Slights during a hearing last year that before they sue over the FTC settlement they wanted to know: “Did anyone say, ‘Go ask the FTC, would you take less money if Mr. Zuckerberg is personally liable’?”

Slights refused to order the company to turn over documents that Facebook said were protected by attorney-client privilege, in part because the judge said shareholders could gain insights from non-privileged electronic communications he was ordering to be disclosed.

(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; additional reporting by Paresh Dave in Oakland, California and Alison Frankel in New York. Editing by Lincoln Feast.)

Copyright 2026 Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Topics Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Trapped Tesla Driver’s 911 Call: ‘It’s on Fire. Help Please’
Howden-Driven Talent War Has Cost Brown & Brown $23M in Revenue, CEO Says
Winter Storm Fern to Cause Up to $6.7B in Insured Losses
AIG, Chubb Can’t Use ‘Bump-Up’ Provision in D&O Policy to Avoid Coverage

Written By Tom Hals

More From Author

Interested in Data Privacy?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: data privacy, Delaware Court of Chancery, Facebook data privacy, FTC Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com

Latest Comments

  • February 11, 2021 at 6:24 pm
    Common Sense says:
    Should have been 10 times the amount.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (1)Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

More News
LA Mayor Race Shaken by Wildfire Allegations
Allstate CEO Wilson Takes on Affordability Issue During Earnings Call
WTW Reports Q4 Organic Revenue Growth of 6%; Data Center Clients Boost Business
Pipeline Explodes at Delfin LNG Planned Project in Louisiana
More News Features

Read This Next

  • Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement
  • After Falling 6% in 2025, Average Auto Insurance Cost Will Stabilize in 2026, Says Insurify
  • Florida House Panel Approves Bill to Waive Permits on Work of Less Than $7,500
  • Pace of Insurance M&A Lagged in 2025 With No 'Mad Dash': OPTIS
  • Supreme Court to Weigh FCC Power to Fine in New Regulatory Clash

Insurance Jobs

  • Direct Sales Agent Specialist (7085) - Arlington, TX
  • Commercial Claims Adjuster – Carrier or TPA – REMOTE - Remote
  • Major Case Specialist – Construction Liability - Diamond Bar, CA
  • Auto Bodily Injury Claim Representative - Downers Grove, IL
  • Senior Architect – Personal Insurance Enterprise - Hartford, CT
MyNewMarkets
  • Is It Covered?: Does 'Under Construction' Include 'Renovation'?
  • Viewpoint: Inside the Machinery of Medical Abuse in Liability Claims
  • Insurtech Lemonade Starts Autonomous Car Product With Tesla's Data
  • Adjusters Launch 'CarFax for Insurance Claims' to Vet Carriers' Damage Estimates
  • Every Superman Has His Kryptonite: How to Protect Key Executives with Specialized Coverage
Claims Journal
  • CCC Intelligent Solutions Names Valdez Chief Product Officer
  • Portugal Rolls Out $2.9 Billion Aid as Deadly Flooding Spreads
  • Elon Musk Alone Can't Explain Tesla's Owner Exodus
  • Study Ties Particle Pollution From Wildfire Smoke to 24K US Deaths Per Year
  • Verizon Wireless Sues T-Mobile, Alleges False Advertising
Academy of Insurance education
  • February 12 Who's Driving This? Where Are We Going with Autonomous Vehicles?
  • February 19 ISO Business Owners Program Changes: What You Need to Know
  • March 5 Parametric Risk Contracts: Not Your Traditional Insurance Product
  • March 19 Customer Support: The Continuum of Service, Satisfaction, and Success

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2026 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map