Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • Berkshire Selects Gen Re’s Shamieh as Insurance Chief
  • Allstate Q1 Net Income Skyrockets
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement

By Tom Hals | February 11, 2021
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article
  • 1 Comment

Facebook Inc. may have paid $4.9 billion more than the maximum penalty it faced under a settlement agreement with regulators related to allegations it mishandled user privacy, according to a Wednesday court ruling.

The information made public by a Delaware judge who gleaned it from a “white paper” prepared by a law firm advising Facebook’s board of directors as they debated a proposed $5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission. That agreement also protected Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg.

Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights of the Court of Chancery cited the paper by Gibson Dunn attorneys in his ruling directing Facebook to turn over documents to shareholders who are trying to determine if Facebook overpaid to protect Zuckerberg.

“The documents already produced provide no insight into why Facebook would pay more than its (apparently) maximum exposure to settle a claim,” said Slights in the ruling. Shareholders, he said, were “right to question whether internal communications among Facebook fiduciaries might shed light on the Board’s thinking in this regard.”

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The July 2019 deal resolved allegations Facebook mishandled user privacy. The company did not admit wrongdoing.

Slights said Facebook faced a maximum penalty of about $104 million, according to the Gibson Dunn paper.

The FTC did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

Joel Fleming, an attorney for the Facebook shareholders, told Slights during a hearing last year that before they sue over the FTC settlement they wanted to know: “Did anyone say, ‘Go ask the FTC, would you take less money if Mr. Zuckerberg is personally liable’?”

Slights refused to order the company to turn over documents that Facebook said were protected by attorney-client privilege, in part because the judge said shareholders could gain insights from non-privileged electronic communications he was ordering to be disclosed.

(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; additional reporting by Paresh Dave in Oakland, California and Alison Frankel in New York. Editing by Lincoln Feast.)

Copyright 2026 Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Topics Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Study Suggests Federal Action to Realize Insurance Savings
Progressive Insurance Helps First-Time Homebuyers With Down Payments
Business investment and stock market, Businessman holding dollars banknotes in hands, Economic growth, Currency exchange, Business financial concept.Lawyers, Traders Among 30 Charged in Global Insider Trading Case
Trump Administration Targets Dismantling of Already-Weakened DEI

Written By Tom Hals

More From Author

Interested in Data Privacy?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: data privacy, Delaware Court of Chancery, Facebook data privacy, FTC Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com

Latest Comments

  • February 11, 2021 at 6:24 pm
    Common Sense says:
    Should have been 10 times the amount.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (1)Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

More News
Fertilizer Firms See Profit Windfall as War Upends Supplies
Florida Governor Signs Bill Dropping Building Permits for Work Valued at $7,500 or Less
Strait of Hormuz Transits Halted Since Tuesday as US, Iran Clash
Nissan Cancels Plan to Build Electric SUVs at Mississippi Plant
More News Features

Read This Next

  • Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement
  • Workers' Comp: What to Know About Workplace Violence; Victims Are Most Often Healthcare Workers and Teachers
  • Tornado Tears Through Oklahoma Town, Damaging 40 Homes
  • SC Bill Would Change 'Free' Windshield Replacement and Give DOI More Authority
  • The Hartford Q1 Net Income Up 36%

Insurance Jobs

  • VP of Insurance-Profit Sharing - Remote
  • Auto Supplement Writer - Virginia, VA
  • Data Analyst – Insurance – REMOTE - Remote
  • Construction Loss Sensitive Underwriter, Account Executive - Richardson, TX
  • Director, Medical Payment Operation Workers’ Compensation - Remote
MyNewMarkets
  • Stressing Out Over the Right Risks
  • How Parametric Products Can Help Business Resilience Amid Climate Uncertainty
  • Oh, the Places You Can Go in Insurance
  • 5 Ways for Insurance Brokers to Avoid Liability to Clients
  • Is It Covered?: The Additional Insured Illusion
Claims Journal
  • Canvas Service Used by Thousands of Colleges Hacked
  • CorVel Names Schraml Director of SIU
  • Meta Challenges UK Regulator Over Online Safety Fees, Fines
  • Balancing Technology and Expertise in Property Insurance Claims
  • Europe's First Robotaxi Service Is Underway in Croatia at $2.33 a Ride
Academy of Insurance education
  • May 14th 21st Century Political Risk
  • June 4th Saving Commercial Property Insureds from an Epic Coverage Fail
  • June 11th Emerging E&O Risks for 2026
  • June 18th Agency Best Practices Revisited: Why The Order Taker Standard Does NOT Work to Your Detriment

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2026 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map