Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • 5 Reasons Why the US Escaped a Hurricane Landfall
  • Families of Camp Mystic Victims Allege Negligence
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement

By Tom Hals | February 11, 2021
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article
  • 1 Comment

Facebook Inc. may have paid $4.9 billion more than the maximum penalty it faced under a settlement agreement with regulators related to allegations it mishandled user privacy, according to a Wednesday court ruling.

The information made public by a Delaware judge who gleaned it from a “white paper” prepared by a law firm advising Facebook’s board of directors as they debated a proposed $5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission. That agreement also protected Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg.

Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights of the Court of Chancery cited the paper by Gibson Dunn attorneys in his ruling directing Facebook to turn over documents to shareholders who are trying to determine if Facebook overpaid to protect Zuckerberg.

“The documents already produced provide no insight into why Facebook would pay more than its (apparently) maximum exposure to settle a claim,” said Slights in the ruling. Shareholders, he said, were “right to question whether internal communications among Facebook fiduciaries might shed light on the Board’s thinking in this regard.”

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The July 2019 deal resolved allegations Facebook mishandled user privacy. The company did not admit wrongdoing.

Slights said Facebook faced a maximum penalty of about $104 million, according to the Gibson Dunn paper.

The FTC did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

Joel Fleming, an attorney for the Facebook shareholders, told Slights during a hearing last year that before they sue over the FTC settlement they wanted to know: “Did anyone say, ‘Go ask the FTC, would you take less money if Mr. Zuckerberg is personally liable’?”

Slights refused to order the company to turn over documents that Facebook said were protected by attorney-client privilege, in part because the judge said shareholders could gain insights from non-privileged electronic communications he was ordering to be disclosed.

(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; additional reporting by Paresh Dave in Oakland, California and Alison Frankel in New York. Editing by Lincoln Feast.)

Copyright 2025 Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Topics Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

What Progressive and GEICO Q3 Results Reveal About Auto Insurance Profit, Growth
Marsh Sues More Former Employees Over ‘Scheme’ to Open Howden US
Catastrophe Bonds Absorb ‘Black Swan’ Event Dealt by Melissa
China Accuses US of Orchestrating $13 Billion Bitcoin Hack

Written By Tom Hals

More From Author

Interested in Data Privacy?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: data privacy, Delaware Court of Chancery, Facebook data privacy, FTC Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com

Latest Comments

  • February 11, 2021 at 6:24 pm
    Common Sense says:
    Should have been 10 times the amount.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (1)Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

More News
Businessman Accused in Trafigura Nickel Nightmare Goes on Trial
Immigration Enforcement Surge Begins in Charlotte, Federal Officials Confirm
Anthropic Warns of AI-Driven Hacking Campaign Linked to China
European Central Bank’s Guindos Says Financial-Stability Risks Remain Elevated
More News Features

Read This Next

  • Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement
  • Baldwin Group Posts $30M Q3 Loss But Expects More Embedded Builders Growth
  • Insurers Paid Nearly £200 Million in Cyber Claims for UK Businesses in 2024
  • Don't Look Now, But Florida's State Plan, Citizens, Is No Longer the Largest Property Insurer in the Sunshine State
  • Louisiana Judge Invalidates Permit for LNG Facility, Orders Review of Climate Impact

Insurance Jobs

  • Insurance Account Executive - Remote/ Brooklyn, NY
  • Paralegal Specialist (Remote – Knoxville, TN) - Tennessee, TN
  • Sr. Database Engineer – Mainframe - Hartford, CT
  • Trainee Property Adjuster – Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN
  • Security Software Engineer - Remote, IL
MyNewMarkets
  • Keeping Small Business Insurance Customers
  • From Oily Rags to a Break Room Microwave: Combatting Overlooked Risks in High-Severity Industries
  • Death and Insurance (Not Taxes), Part 2
  • Bigger Piece of the Pie: Surplus Lines Market Hits New Record as Specialty Lines Continue to Grow in Prominence, Market Share
  • Death and Insurance (Not Taxes): Part One
Claims Journal
  • PwC: Insurance Execs Say Agentic AI Leading Industry Transformation
  • Judge to OK Purdue Pharma's Massive Opioid Bankruptcy Settlement
  • NFIP Reauthorized With Passage of Funding Bill to End Government Shutdown
  • Jaguar Land Rover Margin Forecast Cut After Cyberattack
  • BHP Liable for Brazil Dam Collapse, UK Court Rules in Mammoth Lawsuit
Academy of Insurance education
  • October 21 E&S Property Underwriting
  • October 23 Gotchas That'll Getchya - Latest Policy Language That'll Get You Sued
  • October 30 Challenges in Agency Mergers – Reducing Staff Flight and Avoiding E&O Claims
  • November 6 Risk and Insurance for Digital Nomads

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2025 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map