Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • AccuWeather Hurricane Forecast: 11-16 Named Storms
  • Chubb Outlines $20B Gulf Reinsurance Facility
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement

By Tom Hals | February 11, 2021
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article
  • 1 Comment

Facebook Inc. may have paid $4.9 billion more than the maximum penalty it faced under a settlement agreement with regulators related to allegations it mishandled user privacy, according to a Wednesday court ruling.

The information made public by a Delaware judge who gleaned it from a “white paper” prepared by a law firm advising Facebook’s board of directors as they debated a proposed $5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission. That agreement also protected Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg.

Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights of the Court of Chancery cited the paper by Gibson Dunn attorneys in his ruling directing Facebook to turn over documents to shareholders who are trying to determine if Facebook overpaid to protect Zuckerberg.

“The documents already produced provide no insight into why Facebook would pay more than its (apparently) maximum exposure to settle a claim,” said Slights in the ruling. Shareholders, he said, were “right to question whether internal communications among Facebook fiduciaries might shed light on the Board’s thinking in this regard.”

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The July 2019 deal resolved allegations Facebook mishandled user privacy. The company did not admit wrongdoing.

Slights said Facebook faced a maximum penalty of about $104 million, according to the Gibson Dunn paper.

The FTC did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

Joel Fleming, an attorney for the Facebook shareholders, told Slights during a hearing last year that before they sue over the FTC settlement they wanted to know: “Did anyone say, ‘Go ask the FTC, would you take less money if Mr. Zuckerberg is personally liable’?”

Slights refused to order the company to turn over documents that Facebook said were protected by attorney-client privilege, in part because the judge said shareholders could gain insights from non-privileged electronic communications he was ordering to be disclosed.

(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; additional reporting by Paresh Dave in Oakland, California and Alison Frankel in New York. Editing by Lincoln Feast.)

Copyright 2026 Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Topics Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Depreciation on ACV is OK, Court Says in Knocking Down Class Action vs. Cincinnati
Viewpoint: Insurance Broker Valuations – The Elephant in the Room
Kazan, Russia - Jan 31, 2022: Gavel on table against the background of Meta company logo. The concept of the trial.Meta Loses Insurance for Defense in Major Social Media Addiction Litigation
Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Will Again Accept Actual Cash Value Home Insurance

Written By Tom Hals

More From Author

Interested in Data Privacy?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: data privacy, Delaware Court of Chancery, Facebook data privacy, FTC Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com

Latest Comments

  • February 11, 2021 at 6:24 pm
    Common Sense says:
    Should have been 10 times the amount.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (1)Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

More News
Lawsuit Alleges Microbetting Product by DraftKings, FanDuel, NFL Leads to Addiction
Georgia Employers Fined for Repeat Silica Exposure for Workers
Georgia Tax Bill Would Take Billions in Breaks From Companies
US Senate Votes to Fund Most of Homeland Security After Shutdown Disrupts Airports
More News Features

Read This Next

  • Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement
  • Ohio AG Sues Contractors for Allegedly Defrauding Consumers
  • US Judge Again Refuses to Allow New Hampshire to Abolish Auto Inspections
  • Business Planning in a Snap: Part Two
  • About to Take Off?: Legal Fights Emerge Over Toxic Fumes on Flights

Insurance Jobs

  • Insurance Account Manager - New York City
  • Commercial Lines Insurance Customer Service Rep (CSR) – REMOTE - Remote
  • Senior Director – Data Engineering - Hartford, CT
  • Property Adjuster – Field Estimating – Delaware - Delaware, DE
  • Manager, Corporate Leasing - Hartford, CT
MyNewMarkets
  • Resilience: Cyber Risk Shifts From Disruption to Long-Tail Losses
  • Helping Small Businesses Prepare
  • Agents’ Standard of Care and Insureds’ Duty to Read Their Policies
  • Agritourism Growth Drives Insurance Demand As On-Farm Entertainment Operations Grow, So Do Farmers' Risks
  • Industry Trends to Exploit for 2026: Part One
Claims Journal
  • Toyota's China JVs Recall 560,000 SUVs Over Seat Safety Risk
  • Bessent Says Hormuz Ships Insurance Program to Start Soon
  • Crypto 'Insurance' Might Not Protect You From Theft
  • EFI Global Names McComas Senior Vice President of Sales
  • Car Insurer First Central Is Said to Tap Banks for London IPO
Academy of Insurance education
  • April 2 The Additional Insured Illusion (and Other Feats of Contractual Risk Transfer Magic)
  • April 9 Cyber: No Biz Too Small
  • April 16 When Employees Travel to Other States to Work, Which WC Law Applies?
  • April 27 From Lab to Liability: Peptides and the Future of Insurance

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2026 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map