Skip to content
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
Insurance Journal - Property Casualty Industry News

Featured Stories

  • Lengthy Government Shutdown to Impact Insurers
  • FEMA, Customs and Border Protection Staff Data Stolen
  • Articles
  • Jobs
  • Markets

Current Magazine

current magazine
  • Read Online
  • Subscribe
  • Login
  • Front Page
    • National
    • International
    • Most Popular
    • Magazine
    • Forums
    • Blogs
    • Videos/Podcasts
    • Newsletters
  • News
    • Most Popular
    • National
    • International
    • East
    • Midwest
    • South Central
    • Southeast
    • West
  • Magazines
  • Research
  • Directories
  • Jobs
  • Features
    • Events
    • Forums
    • Market Directories
    • Quotes
    • Polls
    • Rankings & Awards
    • Insurance Giving Back
  • Subscribe

Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement

By Tom Hals | February 11, 2021
Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Article
  • 1 Comment

Facebook Inc. may have paid $4.9 billion more than the maximum penalty it faced under a settlement agreement with regulators related to allegations it mishandled user privacy, according to a Wednesday court ruling.

The information made public by a Delaware judge who gleaned it from a “white paper” prepared by a law firm advising Facebook’s board of directors as they debated a proposed $5 billion settlement with the Federal Trade Commission. That agreement also protected Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg.

Vice Chancellor Joseph Slights of the Court of Chancery cited the paper by Gibson Dunn attorneys in his ruling directing Facebook to turn over documents to shareholders who are trying to determine if Facebook overpaid to protect Zuckerberg.

“The documents already produced provide no insight into why Facebook would pay more than its (apparently) maximum exposure to settle a claim,” said Slights in the ruling. Shareholders, he said, were “right to question whether internal communications among Facebook fiduciaries might shed light on the Board’s thinking in this regard.”

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The July 2019 deal resolved allegations Facebook mishandled user privacy. The company did not admit wrongdoing.

Slights said Facebook faced a maximum penalty of about $104 million, according to the Gibson Dunn paper.

The FTC did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment.

Joel Fleming, an attorney for the Facebook shareholders, told Slights during a hearing last year that before they sue over the FTC settlement they wanted to know: “Did anyone say, ‘Go ask the FTC, would you take less money if Mr. Zuckerberg is personally liable’?”

Slights refused to order the company to turn over documents that Facebook said were protected by attorney-client privilege, in part because the judge said shareholders could gain insights from non-privileged electronic communications he was ordering to be disclosed.

(Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; additional reporting by Paresh Dave in Oakland, California and Alison Frankel in New York. Editing by Lincoln Feast.)

Copyright 2025 Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Topics Legislation

Was this article valuable?

Thank you! Please tell us what we can do to improve this article.

Thank you! % of people found this article valuable. Please tell us what you liked about it.

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Update: National Flood Insurance Program Expires
Gallagher Sues Two Former Brokers Who Started Own Firm
Update: Airbus, Air France Reject Blame Over AF447 Crash, After 16 Years
IBHS Study Shows Smaller Hail May Be More Damaging to Roofs Than Once Believed

Written By Tom Hals

More From Author

Interested in Data Privacy?

Get automatic alerts for this topic.

Email This Subscribe to Newsletter
  • Categories: National NewsTopics: data privacy, Delaware Court of Chancery, Facebook data privacy, FTC Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg
  • Have a hot lead? Email us at newsdesk@insurancejournal.com

Latest Comments

  • February 11, 2021 at 6:24 pm
    Common Sense says:
    Should have been 10 times the amount.

Add a CommentSee All Comments (1)Add a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

More News
ALDOI to Hold Hearing on Planned ProAssurance Merger with FD Insurance
All Injured in Deadly NC Waterfront Bar Shooting Released from Hospital
Markets/Coverages: HSB Launches Cyber Risk Solution for SMEs in UK and Ireland
Charlie Javice Duped JPMorgan Out of $175 Million. The Bank Is Picking Up Her Legal Tab
More News Features

Read This Next

  • Judge Questions Why Facebook May Have Overpaid in Data Privacy Settlement
  • Two High-Profile Personal Injury Law Firms Sue... Each Other
  • Judge Throws Out Trump's $15B Lawsuit Against New York Times
  • IBHS Study Shows Smaller Hail May Be More Damaging to Roofs Than Once Believed
  • Cyberattacks Cost Continental Europe's Largest Economies €307B Over 5 Years: Howden

Insurance Jobs

  • Claims Manager, Insurance & Risk Management - Queens, New York
  • Senior Insurance Agent (3+ Yrs P&C Exp | W-2 | Warm Leads | In-Office Only) Senior Insurance Agent (3+ Yrs P&C Exp | W-2 | Warm Leads | In-Office Only) - Westminster, CO
  • Workers Compensation Claims Adjuster | NY Jurisdiction - Syracuse, NY or Open to remote
  • Customer Service Agent – Personal Lines - Bethlehem, PA
  • Property Adjuster – Field Estimating Chicago, IL - Chicago, IL
MyNewMarkets
  • How to Attract the Next Generation to Insurance
  • 5 Evolving Trends Shaping Architects and Engineers Coverage
  • Rethinking Assault & Battery Liability in Commercial Real Estate
  • From Golf Greens to Sausage Fests: The Wild World of Prize Insurance
  • As Schools Prepare to Pay Athletes, What Role Will Insurance Play?
Claims Journal
  • Jaguar Land Rover Bailout Shows Rising Cost of Cybercrime
  • Chobani Urges End to Dannon Parent's Cold-Brew Coffee Lawsuit
  • J&J Must Pay $966M After LA Jury Finds Company Liable In Talc Cancer Case
  • Toyota Recalling 394K Vehicles for Rearview Camera Issue, NHTSA Says
  • Vietnam Capital Flooded Again After Storm Matmo Sweeps In
Academy of Insurance education
  • October 9 Forward Into The Past: Certificates of Insurance, Additional Insureds, and Other Contractual Risk Transfer Issues
  • October 16 Auto Insurance: You Get What You Pay For
  • October 23 Gotchas That'll Getchya - Latest Policy Language That'll Get You Sued
  • October 30 Challenges in Agency Mergers – Reducing Staff Flight and Avoiding E&O Claims

Insurance News

  • News by Region
  • News by Topic
  • Yesterday

Site Search

Features

  • Insurance Markets Directory
  • Forums
  • A.M. Best Company Ratings
  • Industry Events
  • Agencies For Sale
  • Newswire
  • Insurance Jobs
  • Rankings & Awards

Connect with us

  • Email Newsletters
  • Magazine Subscriptions
  • For Your Website
  • RSS Feeds
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Do Not Sell My Info

Insurance Journal

  • Submit News
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Reprints
  • Link to Us
  • Contact Us

Wells Media Group Network

  • Insurance Journal
  • MyNewMarkets.com
  • Claims Journal
  • Insurance Journal TV
  • Academy of Insurance
  • Carrier Management
© 2025 by Wells Media Group, Inc. Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map