In response to a Nov. 28 press release issued by Yates & Associates [see West Breaking News, Nov. 28], Roger Chaix of R.E. Chaix & Associates reiterated that the out-of-court settlement was mutually agreed upon and that both the Yates complaint and Chaix’s cross-complaint were dismissed.
During a factual hearing in June 2000, the judge completely dismissed the Temporary Restraining Order against Chaix, Hippard, and Ravelo. On Sept. 1, both parties mutually agreed to drop their respective lawsuits.
“We are happy to report that at the June hearing, the judge restated the well-known concept that no MGA ‘owns’ the renewals and the customer (and agent) are not only free to seek the best deal for renewal, but have a duty to do so,” Chaix stated.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
NY Lawmakers Urged to Have Faith in Auto Insurance Reform Numbers. But Do They? 
Valero Port Arthur Refinery Has Fire at Diesel Hydrotreater 
After 62 Years, Florida Appeals Court Drops the Expert Witness Rule on Attorney Fees 
Depreciation on ACV Is OK, Court Says in Knocking Down Class Action vs. Cincinnati 
