Observers say a long legal battle over accusations that a prominent Silicon Valley venture capital firm demeaned women and held them to a different standard than their male colleagues will embolden women in the industry and lead firms to examine their practices and cultures for gender bias.
Though Ellen Pao lost her lawsuit against Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, it became a flashpoint in the ongoing discussion about gender inequity at elite technology and venture capital firms.
“This case has been a real wake-up call for the technology industry in general and the venture capital community in particular,” said Deborah Rhode, a law professor at Stanford University who teaches gender equity law.
The jury of six men and six women rejected all of Pao’s claims against Kleiner Perkins last week, determining the firm did not discriminate against her because she is a woman and did not retaliate against her by failing to promote her and firing her after she filed a sex discrimination complaint.
Pao’s attorneys had presented a long list of alleged indignities to which their client was subjected: a book of erotic poetry from a partner; being asked to take notes like a secretary at a meeting; being cut out of emails and meetings by a male colleague with whom she broke off an affair; and talk about pornography aboard a private plane.
Kleiner Perkins’ attorney, Lynne Hermle, countered that Pao failed as an investor at the company and sued to get a big payout as she was being shown the door.
Rhode and other experts say Kleiner Perkins and the venture capital industry in general did not come out looking good, even though they won the case.
“Venture capital firms recognize it’s not appropriate to be out in the streets celebrating,” said Freada Kapor Klein, founder of the Level Playing Field Institute, a nonprofit that aims to boost minority representation in science, technology, engineering and math fields.
Women hold just 15 percent to 20 percent of the technology jobs at Google, Apple, Facebook and Yahoo, according to company disclosures. The data were embarrassing for an industry that has positioned itself as a meritocracy where intelligence and ingenuity are supposed to be more important than appearances or connections.
The venture capital industry is even more male-dominated, with a study released last year by Babson College in Massachusetts finding that women filled just 6 percent of partner-level positions at 139 venture capital firms in 2013, down from 10 percent in 1999.
Klein said before the verdict she was contacted by more than a dozen venture capital and technology companies asking how they could improve the environment as a result of the Pao case.
The attention surrounding the case makes it more likely other women who believe they have been discriminated against will go to court, said David Lewis, CEO of OperationsInc., a human resources consulting and contracting firm. Two women who formerly worked at Facebook and Twitter filed gender discrimination cases against the companies during the Pao trial. One of Pao’s attorneys, Therese Lawless, is representing the plaintiff in the Facebook lawsuit.
At the very least, Pao’s suit will prompt more women to open up about their experiences in the workplace, said Nicole Sanchez, founder of Vaya Consulting, which tries to help Silicon Valley companies increase diversity.
Associated Press writers Michael Liedtke and Olga Rodriguez contributed to this report.
See related stories:
Woman Loses California Gender-Discrimination Suit
After Pao’s Loss, Silicon Valley Facing More Bias Suits
Gender Discrimination Lawsuit in Silicon Valley Goes To Jury
Judge In California Gender Bias Case Oks Punitive Damages
Female Senior Partner: No Discrimination at California Investment
Woman in California Suit Misrepresented Firing, Says Attorney
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.