National News

U.S. Senate May Drop Public Health Care Option

Copyright Reuters

Lawmakers on both sides of the Capitol struggled to reach a health care deal Tuesday, with Senate Democrats near agreement with three Republicans on a plan that would not include a government-run insurance option backed by President Barack Obama.

After more than six hours of closed-door meetings, however, Democrats in the House of Representatives said they had not reached a deal with rebellious fiscal conservatives and it was unlikely they would vote on a health care overhaul before heading home for their August recess at the end of the week.

House Democratic Leader Steny Hoyer said there would not be a vote on Friday and there was a "pretty slim" chance lawmakers would be held for a vote on Saturday. "We're trying not to foreclose our options," he told reporters.

Obama has pushed for a measure that will rein in health care costs, improve care and cover most of the 46 million uninsured Americans, making it his top legislative priority.

Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee said they were close to success in bipartisan negotiations with three panel Republicans -- even if the full group does not take up the bill before the break starts Aug. 7.

"Whether we get through markup or not I can't tell you today. But I am confident we'll have a concept we'll agree on," Senator John Kerry, a Democratic member of the panel, told reporters.


NON-PROFITS AND TAXES

The Senate Finance negotiations have zeroed in on a plan that would use non-profit cooperatives to compete with private insurers to drive down costs, members say, not the public plan favored by Obama and many Democrats.

The panel also is likely to back a tax on high-cost insurance policies to try to raise revenue and keep costs down.

The White House said it would wait until it sees the bill to comment on the cooperative approach, which is certain to disappoint some Democrats even if it wins over the three Republicans involved in the negotiations.

"I have done a lot of reading on the history of co-ops and it is not a nice history," Senator John Rockefeller told reporters after a closed-door meeting of Democrats.

Democratic Senator Kent Conrad said the approach would use non-profit associations at a state, regional and national level and could attract some 12 million people.

He said the U.S. government could provide about $6 billion in start-up money to help health care cooperatives meet reserve requirements. Any co-op would need about 25,000 members to be financially viable and about 500,000 members to negotiate competitive rates with providers, he said.

Shares of U.S. health insurers rose broadly on Tuesday on hopes a health reform bill would not include a government-run option, which has drawn strong opposition from insurers who fear it would destroy the private marketplace.

The S&P Managed Health Care index of large U.S. health insurers closed 6.5 percent higher.

Aetna rose 12.6 percent, Coventry was up 12.7 percent and Cigna was 7.7 percent higher, all on the New York Stock Exchange. Centene rose 7.9 percent.


NO BLUE DOG DEAL

Obama's drive for a broad overhaul of the health care industry has been stalled in the Senate and House , both controlled by his fellow Democrats. It has been hit by a deluge of criticism over the cost, scope and funding of the more than $1 trillion measure.

Republicans in both chambers have slammed the plans as an expensive first step to a government takeover of health care. No Republican has come out in favor of any of the plans so far, although the three Senate Republicans have worked with Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus to find agreement.

An August deadline to approve initial versions of the bill is dead in the Senate and on life support in the House, where conservative Democrats known as "Blue Dogs" have held up a vote in the Energy and Commerce Committee over cost concerns.

Members of the group met with Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Energy Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel for several hours on Tuesday afternoon and again Tuesday night.

Representative Mike Ross, a leader of the group, said there were still 12 issues of disagreement. "It might be impossible to come to a resolution on some of them," he told reporters.

"We continue to talk," he said as the final meeting broke up. Talks will resume in the morning. "I'd like to think we're making progress," Ross said.

Obama, who over the past week has lobbied hard for the overhaul plan, said there was no time to lose.

"The costs of doing nothing are trillions of dollars in costs over the next couple of decades -- trillions, not billions," Obama told a town hall meeting conducted by AARP, a lobbying group for seniors.

"I understand people being scared that this is going to be way too costly," he said. "It's not too costly if we start making changes right now." (Additional reporting by David Alexander, Rick Cowan and Jackie Frank; Editing by John O'Callaghan and Eric Beech)

Copyright 2009 Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

Comments? Click here to post a comment about this article

Subject Posted By Posted On
RE: Be it so, and God be with thee, Reply to Mr. Upper Case Joe
Aug 3, 2009, 3:58 pm
RE: Sully Tinkerbell
Aug 3, 2009, 3:15 pm
RE: Notice how the lib/Dems flee with you hit'em with facts Sully
Aug 3, 2009, 9:44 am
RE: unless sued! BLUE EYES. nobody important
Aug 1, 2009, 7:47 pm
unless sued! BLUE EYES. insurance company was obligate
Aug 1, 2009, 6:57 pm
Be it so, and God be with thee," said Don Quixote REALLY AMAZES ME THAT THE INSU
Aug 1, 2009, 6:26 pm
reply to Maddog Joe
Jul 31, 2009, 3:59 pm
RE: RE: Notice how the lib/Dems flee with you hit'em with fa MadDog
Jul 31, 2009, 2:43 pm
RE: Notice how the lib/Dems flee with you hit'em with facts IM
Jul 31, 2009, 2:32 pm
Notice how the lib/Dems flee with you hit'em with facts Joe
Jul 31, 2009, 2:20 pm
Inquiring minds Joe
Jul 31, 2009, 1:31 pm
RE: Has anyone read this bill? It's insanity. Inquiring mind
Jul 31, 2009, 1:08 pm
RE: 49m Bubba
Jul 31, 2009, 12:46 pm
RE: to Allan's (and Matt for that matter) re to:The media Joe
Jul 31, 2009, 12:33 pm
Has anyone read this bill? It's insanity. Joe
Jul 31, 2009, 12:21 pm
RE: The media Allan
Jul 30, 2009, 4:43 pm
Americans Will Prevail Hooray for Capitalism!!!
Jul 30, 2009, 3:17 pm
The media Puzzled again
Jul 30, 2009, 2:35 pm
49m Puzzled
Jul 30, 2009, 2:19 pm
RE: RE: Where are the Supporters? The Supporters
Jul 30, 2009, 12:37 pm
RE: Where are the Supporters? discouraged
Jul 30, 2009, 9:16 am
RE: RE: RE: RE: Define Panther
Jul 30, 2009, 8:34 am
Where are the Supporters? Hooray for Capitalism!!!
Jul 29, 2009, 5:59 pm
RE: RE: RE: Define nobody important
Jul 29, 2009, 5:32 pm
RE: What's good for the goose Panther
Jul 29, 2009, 4:33 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Define/for still healthy - riverrat Nebraskan
Jul 29, 2009, 3:57 pm
obamacare has to be good - the government is our friend kentp
Jul 29, 2009, 3:50 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Define Panther
Jul 29, 2009, 3:22 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Define TC
Jul 29, 2009, 3:22 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Define riverrat
Jul 29, 2009, 3:05 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Define Liber-what???????????????
Jul 29, 2009, 2:46 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Define/for still healthy - riverrat riverrat
Jul 29, 2009, 2:38 pm
RE: RE: RE: Define LB
Jul 29, 2009, 2:23 pm
RE: RE: cures California Conservative
Jul 29, 2009, 2:21 pm
What's good for the goose MadDog
Jul 29, 2009, 2:06 pm
RE: RE: RE: RE: Define/for still healthy - riverrat Nebraskan
Jul 29, 2009, 1:59 pm
RE: Hope Nebraskan
Jul 29, 2009, 1:43 pm
RE: RE: RE: Define matt
Jul 29, 2009, 1:35 pm
RE: cures Sue
Jul 29, 2009, 1:25 pm
RE: RE: RE: health ITA Patriot Patriot
Jul 29, 2009, 1:24 pm
RE: RE: health ITA Patriot dawn
Jul 29, 2009, 1:18 pm
RE: RE: RE: Define/for still healthy riverrat
Jul 29, 2009, 1:09 pm
RE: Huh? CTC
Jul 29, 2009, 1:05 pm
RE: health Patriot
Jul 29, 2009, 1:05 pm
RE: RE: Define Still Healthy
Jul 29, 2009, 12:56 pm
Hope riverrat
Jul 29, 2009, 12:54 pm
Huh? Brokette
Jul 29, 2009, 12:53 pm
health larry
Jul 29, 2009, 12:48 pm
RE: matt is partially right kentp
Jul 29, 2009, 10:41 am
RE: Define matt
Jul 29, 2009, 10:27 am
Define "Most" Anon
Jul 29, 2009, 9:56 am