A federal judge is allowing the bulk of a lawsuit accusing Starbucks of systematically under-filling lattes to move forward.
Two California residents are suing the Seattle-based coffee chain, claiming that Starbucks lattes are only filled to about 75 percent of the cup’s capacity. The lawsuit says Starbucks instituted a recipe in 2009 to create smaller lattes in order to save money on milk.
A federal judge in San Francisco has thrown out three of the eight claims filed against Starbucks.
Starbucks spokesman Reggie Borges says in a statement that the company believes the lawsuit is “without merit” and it will be prepared to defend itself in court. He says if a customer is unhappy with their beverage, Starbucks “will gladly remake it.”
Related:
- Jury: Starbucks Not Liable in North Carolina Officer Coffee Burn Suit
- Starbucks Sued for Firing Dwarf from Barista Job
- California Woman Accused of Poisoning Juice At Starbucks
- Women Impaled by Coffee Presses Sue Companies in Oregon
- Starbucks Sued by North Carolina Police Officer Burned by Free Coffee
Topics Lawsuits California Legislation
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
‘Clear Soft Market Conditions’ for Commercial P/C Lines in Q3, Says CIAB
What Progressive and GEICO Q3 Results Reveal About Auto Insurance Profit, Growth
Nonstandard Auto Insurers Continue Profit Momentum in 2025: AM Best
Parkland Shooting Wasn’t Multiple Incidents With Multiple Deductibles, Court Says 

