A South Carolina company’s lawsuit accusing a former employee of costing it hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost business when he took Twitter followers can go forward, a federal judge has ruled.
San Francisco-based U.S. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James ruled that Noah Kravitz had not made strong enough arguments to dismiss the lawsuit by PhoneDog LLC. A hearing in the case is set for later this year.
Kravitz worked for the Mount Pleasant-based company – a website that reviews mobile devices like phones and tablets – from 2006 until 2010. PhoneDog sued him in July, saying that, when he resigned, Kravitz changed his Twitter name from PhoneDog_Noah to noahkravitz, and kept his 17,000 followers.
The company said the followers should be treated like a customer list, and therefore PhoneDog’s property. According to the company, Kravitz should pay $2.50 per follower per month for eight months, or a total of $340,000.
Kravitz, who now lives in Oakland, Calif., eventually went to work for a competitor website and now boasts more than 24,000 Twitter followers.
Topics Lawsuits Legislation South Carolina
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
MIT Grad Brothers Fraud Jury Unable to Reach a Verdict 
Americans Are Moving Out of Flood-Prone Neighborhoods 
Baldwin Group Posts $30M Q3 Loss But Expects More Embedded Builders Growth 
Update: Jamaica to Get Record $70.8M Parametric Payout for Hurricane Melissa From This Issue
