Supreme Court Rejects Pfizer Bid for Shield From Asbestos Suits

By | June 24, 2013

The U.S. Supreme Court refused to shield Pfizer Inc. from some asbestos lawsuits connected to its Quigley Co. subsidiary, a bankrupt unit that stopped most operations in 1992.

The justices today rejected Pfizer’s appeal of a ruling that opened the New York-based drugmaker to some claims related to Quigley, which made asbestos-containing products for the steel industry from the 1940s to the 1970s. Pfizer acquired Quigley in 1968. Asbestos, once widely used an insulator, was later shown to cause cancer.

Pfizer, the world’s largest drugmaker, contended that Quigley’s bankruptcy proceedings insulated the parent company from suits filed under Pennsylvania state law by the Baltimore law firm of Peter Angelos.

The firm began suing Pfizer in Pennsylvania state courts in 1999, saying the company was legally responsible for some claims because its logo appeared on Quigley products.

Pfizer says it played no role in making or selling the Quigley products. A federal appeals court in New York said the claims against Pfizer could go forward.

The Obama administration urged the high court to reject Pfizer’s appeal.

The bankruptcy case is In re Quigley Co., 04-15739, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan). The Supreme Court case is Pfizer v. Law Offices of Peter Angelos, 12-300.

With assistance from Tiffany Kary in New York. Editors: Laurie Asseo, Mark McQuillan.

Topics Lawsuits New York

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.